WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

What if China simply announced it is taking Taiwan and moves troops in ?

The U S could simply do nothing , except maybe deliver a strongly worded speech or two.

The U S could send Carrier groups etc , and engage , but what if they suffer major defeats ?

Our allies must be trying to figure out why they should stay allies .

Whuch ya think faggots ?

What if China simply announced it is taking Taiwan and moves troops in ? The U S could simply do nothing , except maybe deliver a strongly worded speech or two. The U S could send Carrier groups etc , and engage , but what if they suffer major defeats ? Our allies must be trying to figure out why they should stay allies . Whuch ya think faggots ?

(post is archived)

[–] 9 pts (edited )

To move troops in, you have to have cargo and troop lift, and landing craft stacked from here to Taipei. China doesn't. Not in the numbers it would need. It's building that fleet, but it doesn't have it now. Having a two-million man army is great, but unless they are all Olympic level swimmers, they ain't making it to Taiwan in numbers.

Beyond that, Taiwan is essentially a massive aircraft carrier, bristling with weaponry. The Chinese aren't coming anywhere near it without losing half the fleet they send against it.

The US under this bullshit stewardship will do nothing but talk tough. And, yes, that will be the end of US world policing. That's the direction the US was heading anyway, but it will accelerate it by decades. Then the world gets to see what it's like to live without Uncle Sam protecting shipping. (Hint: it ain't good.)

But I would probably expect Japan to step in. Japan has the second largest blue water fleet in the world, and they will use it to defend Taiwan because they could be next if China isn't put back in its box. I think that will be the accelerant. If Japan steps in, the US will have to step in immediately after.

So, you have to ask yourself if China gets more concessions by threatening to invade Taiwan, or actually invading Taiwan. China, to a large extent, exists on extortion. When's the last time they have actually DONE anything.

Keep in mind that China's biggest threat has always been... China. They have spent century after century trying to hold the empire together. Showing weakness on the international stage, actually choking on a Taiwan invasion and showing your mortality, means about 5 regions of China consider independence. (And, add that the current Chinese leadership is already in trouble...) That's why they have a two-million man army because they can walk to those revolting regions if they have to. It wasn't built for invading.

They would start about a half dozen civil wars with a failed invasion attempt AND become an international pariah state. Why would they do that?

Or they can just keep talking and hope people continue to cave to all their demands. Because the West has clearly shown they will at every turn.

I might be wrong. See what happens.

[–] 1 pt

This is the the best response of all the comments so far. Not sure about Japan stepping in. Living here the population is pretty cucked. They would need the US to tell it what to do. There's a reason they have a "self defense force". It's name only. But the mindset has to be overcome to actually take on China.

But it can't be stressed enough how difficult moving an army to invade would be. I firmly believe the US is a paper tiger if we get punched in the face with the loss of a carrier. But the Chinese are also a paper tiger as you alluded to. Stolen and subpar technology and copies of our systems can only get you so far. Plus you have their population becoming more decadent and weak (mirroring us). With their population on the downslope, like most Asian countries, China only has a few more decades to expand their influence. So we will see what damage the CCP can do while they remain in power.

[–] 1 pt

True about Japan. They may be just as hollow a threat as the US is.

I can't even imagine the reaction of the current administration if the US lost a carrier. Half the administration would call for immediate surrender. The other half for full-scale nuclear war.

[–] 1 pt

You don't think like a Chink.

They don't need to move all 2MM troops in. They just need to move enough in to start the long festering Taiwan civil war. I think that their ability to act as massive carrier is overrated, because it is based on our tech, which is overrated and still has to be operated by bugmen. Half the fleet gone in the attack? I think the CCP likes those odds. The good news for us is that their weather window will close at the end of this month, so if we get through the next couple of weeks, the CCP won't have a window to attack again until April.

It's like Ukraine. It only ends one way -- Ukraine loses. The question is, how bad and how much do we end up losing in the process? With Taiwan, I could see us surging 1-2 CVBGs and them getting their shit pushed in and having a chat with Davy Jones. At that point, it doesn't matter how many dozens of bugmen we shot down in the process. We've shit away trillions in hardware and trained men for nothing, and they've spent maybe a hundred million.

What do we do then? We talk a bunch of shit, we park three more CVBGs 1000 km away on the other side of Japan, talk some more shit, tell the nips to do something, and then "impose sanctions."

The only question that matters is if the CCP takes Taiwan without wrecking the semiconductor plants.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah, the Chinese definitely think like the Russians (...or the other way around...) They won't care how many tens of thousands die. Meanwhile, we'll lose our minds over a supply ship going down. (Not to minimize the loss of lives.) We're not mentally ready for that war.

I think 'sanctions' are likely all Biden would ever consider. Whatever the hell that means. Fewer Chinese hooker/spies allowed into the US?

Good point about the window closing.

[–] 0 pt

I cant see a way the US, Japan and Australia dont get involved. You think the military industrial complex is going to miss out on that sweet warfare welfare that a war like that would bring? China would have to blockade Taiwan to prevent the MID from getting weapons in. They cant do it without forcing America to get directly involved. If Taiwan has open supply lines, China will not be able to get air supremacy. If China cant take over the sky, they have absolutely no chance of getting any number of troops across the straight, much less on to the beaches and getting a forward operating base set up. None of this even takes into account the horrible age demographic issues china has.

[–] 0 pt

I think that when enough of our whiz-bang defense welfare shit gets demolished in the first week, the defcontractors will be the ones telling .mil to lay off, to protect their own reputations. They make money killing defenseless people. They haven't had a fair fight in 70 years and don't want to start now.

[–] 5 pts

Blow up Three Gorges Dam. Blame it on the now non-existent nation.

[–] 2 pts

Interesting the proxy war potential... Cept the US is so damn dumb they'll be announcing it. Not that it should be using Taiwan and Taiwan people as a battle ground for their war.

[–] 1 pt

Like a Nordstream event on land

[–] 1 pt

It's already crumbling, lol, just wait a few

Hit it with a tungsten rod from a satellite. Nothing they can do.

[–] 0 pt

Sure, it's not like we don't have crumbling infrastructure that can be taken out. Thank God China doesn't have the ability to make nukes or put satellites in orbit, or else it's certain that they would have one in a polar orbit that they can detonate over the US at will and take out our whole grid with a HEMP attack.

[–] 0 pt

Assuming it works as intended.

[–] 0 pt

The HEMP device or our grid?

If the HEMP device (which is not hard to make for a nuclear power) is only 10% effective, then a third of the US is fucked rather than the entire lower 48. If our grid is only 90% effective at dealing with it, that 1/3 of the country drags the entire country's grid down with it. Maybe in that scenario, the 2/3 that only got dragged down rather than being actively surged can be energized in a month or two, and they can help bring the actually attacked part of the grid up in another year.

I am in no way confident that we are that competent.

[–] 5 pts

Joe Biden wouldn't lift a finger. His handlers would come up with some excuse to justify China's aggression. They are too deeply linked to China to defy the communist Chinese leadership. At most, Dementia Joe would announce some useless sanctions that would accomplish even less than his sanctions against Russia.

[–] 3 pts

Which would make our allies wonder if we really are allies , imho

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I once came across videos by a guy claiming to be a prophet. I don't care to argue or speculate about whether that's true. However, he was warning that one day China would launch an invasion of the left coast of the United States. Of course people say that it couldn't happen, because the good ol' USA would nuke the hell out of China. This got me thinking, though, that there could be two other things that happen. The first is that the Chinese have developed anti-missile technology so good that it can prevent us from nuking them. The second is that there would simply be a stand down coming from inside our own government. Of course the former scenario is based on assuming the best we can do is 1940s technology, which is laughably ridiculous. There's no knowing what kind of highly advanced weapons shit we've got now. Of course, because of Jews, China's military and government probably know more about our secret weapons than the American public. This leaves the stand down option as the most likely scenario, and it totally isn't beyond belief that someone like Joe Biden or some future piece-of-shit, puppet president would simply just let a thing like that happen.

[–] 3 pts

what is the point of invading USA ? what is to gain ? nothing

USA is doing all by itself, you just need to wait

[–] 0 pt

More territory and maybe they will make slaves out of people here, but it seems like they've got plenty of "slaves" already.

[–] 4 pts

it is not "what if" but "when"

is it "convenient" now ? no, no need to hurry

Taiwan will strangle itself, lots of money wasted in useless arms

what is needed is to stop usa sending useless boats there, eventually one of them will "malfunction" and be "gently carried to a Chinese place"

and wait there until all sailors are disembarked and sent to USA soil

the ship will be towed to some USA port, slowly

[–] 3 pts

I don't think DC is going to do anything meaningful, the idiots in charge are owned by the CCP. The CCP is opening police stations here, that's really all you need to know about it.

Our allies must be trying to figure out why they should stay allies .

Ally status should be evaluated every 20 or 30 years with any treaties and agreements expiring and renegotiated.

[–] 2 pts

What do you mean retake? It was never theirs to begin with.

[–] 0 pt

Semantics , ok take

[–] 1 pt

Okay, semantics.

I am not sure if China will ever be able to tame Taiwan peacefully. The southern native Taiwanese vs the northerners Chinese traitors are completely different people. It will become a guerrilla war of South vs North.

As for the geo ramifications, it will just become a proxy war between east vs west where only the innocent civilians suffer.

[–] 0 pt

If the natives had any balls, it would still be Formosa. The chinese traitors will flip as soon as it is obvious they lost -- it's what traitors do.

[–] 0 pt

Nah, it's retake, unless you think that the CCP is somehow separate from China. They held it from the 17th century, until the Nips took it from them in the late 19th century. The nips held it a while, then the whole failed independent Formosa for a minute, and then the Losers from the Chinese civil war holed up there, which, if you are honest, means that it's still occupied by the Chinese. It's just a matter of which slants.

[–] 2 pts

I hope from the bottom of my heart that China takes Taiwan. I hope the US Navy motors back to the west coast and seeks to defend this nation from the invasion in the south as opposed to wasting time and resources fucking about with the slants. Muh chip manufacturing. Lets make it wide-open. Like an X prize to build them here smaller and better. Simple as that. Fuck Taiwan, ,if they want to stay free they should team up with the Japs and Koreans and build nukes to defend themselves.

[–] 1 pt

Taiwan is home to most of the world's microchip fabrication machines.

Say goodbye to 90% of the world's silicone production. China would hoard it all up.

[–] 1 pt

From what I know of the semiconductor industry the United States can’t let China take Taiwan

[–] 1 pt

I think we'd just battle with planes and ships and maybe some specops but not fight with land armies

[–] 2 pts

Like Carrier groups ?

[–] 0 pt

Subs and carriers and cruisers

[–] 1 pt

That's called a Carrier Battle Group.

[–] 1 pt

Then China gets Taiwan.

Load more (8 replies)