Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

764

I'm thinking Somewhere in South America would be mostly safe from radiation. Food shortages from a nuclear winter could still be a problem.

I'm thinking Somewhere in South America would be mostly safe from radiation. Food shortages from a nuclear winter could still be a problem.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

For avoiding nuclear annihilation, I would focus on the southern hemisphere. Maybe some place like Patagonia in South America or an isolated island in the south Atlantic like St. Helena or Tristan da Cunha.

While you are busy barely surviving however, you might wish you were dead...

[–] • 1 pt

While you are busy barely surviving however, you might wish you were dead...

Truth to that.

[–] • 1 pt

Any hell hole country in Africa. Nobody would bother with it , and eventually you could become a White God/King

[–] • 2 pts

Ugh, idk. I figure no one really is going to bother with S. America either and I'd rather live among the spics than the niggers. At least the young Latinas are usually hot.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah , I'm with you as far as the women go. I could never bang a nigger , but I rather enjoy latina's

[–] • 1 pt

Depending on the radiation released, your current location may be best. Assuming you have a roof over your head that can deflect radioactive rain. The fallout from Fukushima went everywhere and there was no escape, except perhaps underground with access to deep wells. Everyone else gets irradiated so the question then becomes how badly.

Staying out of the rain is kind of critical.

If it's large doses of gamma fallout with a half life of 100,000 years, then we, and almost all surface life here, are pretty much done. Some ocean life may survive even that. Assuming we can keep the water if the plankton die. Life will return later on, but we will be extinct long before then.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Most bombs will airburst and are highly efficient. Airburst typically will have minimal fallout. Im not even sure fallout will be the main issue in a modern nuclear war. Obviously the places directly hit will be irradiated but there may not be much affect on everything else. The first bombs they dropped on japan were pretty shitty and only a fraction of the uranium actually detonated. Modern bombs are likely to detonate 99% of the fissile material.

[–] • 1 pt

It really depends on the scalenuclear winter would set humanity back to the stone age but one or two tactical strikes might be just a small blip that upsets very little. I agree with South America as being relatively safe, and I'll add Australia to that list of safe places, as an upside they speak English.

[–] • 1 pt

Detroit. The before and after photos should look about the same.

[–] • 1 pt

I'm going to Israel, Jews seem to escape death efficiently.

[–] • 1 pt

Turkey, since roaches will survive anything.

[+] [deleted] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

The people in power deciding our fates are lazy spoiled sacks of shit. They don't want to destroy the planet with radiation and they don't want to live underground.

If bombs drop in January, they want to be on the beaches and on their yachts by summer. So obviously they can't make a big mess or they'll never get enough goy to mop it up before the season starts.

This threat of nuclear war is just the next fear campaign right before the elections.

Load more (1 reply)