Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

575

I was discussing was trying to discuss N.S. Germany with a coworker and the subject of the labor based currency came up (for example, 1 dollar equals 1 hour of work or goods produced). My coworker had apparently already heard about it, and went on about how it somehow ended with N.S. Germany having hyperinflation at the end and that it would never work. He was not exactly clear why, and I could not find any information about N.S. Germany having hyperinflation, only the (((Weimar Republic))).

Still, I have never heard about hyperinflation in the Reich before. Is there any truth to this guy's claim or is he just running his mouth?

I was discussing was trying to discuss N.S. Germany with a coworker and the subject of the labor based currency came up (for example, 1 dollar equals 1 hour of work or goods produced). My coworker had apparently already heard about it, and went on about how it somehow ended with N.S. Germany having hyperinflation at the end and that it would never work. He was not exactly clear why, and I could not find any information about N.S. Germany having hyperinflation, only the (((Weimar Republic))). Still, I have never heard about hyperinflation in the Reich before. Is there any truth to this guy's claim or is he just running his mouth?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (20).
[–] • -1 pt

Government run social programs and welfare programs are, by their very nature, economic policies.

If you disagree, you're going to need to provide a pretty substantial argument for your position.

[–] • -1 pt

Firefighting, EMT and rescue programs are, by their very nature, economic policies.

If you disagree, you're going to need to provide a pretty substantial argument for your position.

You "argue" like a jew.

Policing and criminal justice are, by their very nature, economic policies.

If you disagree, you're going to need to provide a pretty substantial argument for your position.

You are among the worst of us.

Education programs are, by their very nature, economic policies.

If you disagree, you're going to need to provide a pretty substantial argument for your position.

You don't understand history or facts so you fallback on what jews tell you to believe.

[–] • 0 pt

> this guy used words as they're defined, how jewish!!

Do you think none of those things are financed by taxes collected by the government? Do you think that the allocation of those funds doesn't fall under the definition of "economic policy"? Are you, not just partially but, full blown retarded?

You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the definitions of words in this conversation. Instead of admitting you're wrong or trying to learn, you kevetch about jews. You're one of the dumbest niggers on this website.

[–] • 0 pt

Those things, like welfare, are not economic policy in nature. What you're describing would make every single thing a government can do, does, or would do as an economic policy and therefore socialist. That isn't how it works, circular logic is wrong, you're wrong. Social programs are social in nature. Welfare is a social program. Scroll up for the difference because you are clearly so stupid you can't even see your own folly. I'm done now with you. I recognize your name as one of the hundreds of (((accounts))) who joined and spam downvoted me for no reason at all, got blocked, ublocked and started to follow me around and comment like you knew me. You aren't worth it. You're describing "crass marxism", a jewish ideal.