Those things, like welfare, are not economic policy in nature. What you're describing would make every single thing a government can do, does, or would do as an economic policy and therefore socialist. That isn't how it works, circular logic is wrong, you're wrong. Social programs are social in nature. Welfare is a social program. Scroll up for the difference because you are clearly so stupid you can't even see your own folly. I'm done now with you. I recognize your name as one of the hundreds of (((accounts))) who joined and spam downvoted me for no reason at all, got blocked, ublocked and started to follow me around and comment like you knew me. You aren't worth it. You're describing "crass marxism", a jewish ideal.
>Those things, like welfare, are not economic policy in nature
So you are full blown retarded.
Nigger, you downvote me everytime I disagree with you. I just do it back to you now because I know it triggers you. Nobody "follows you around". You aren't that important, get over yourself.
Social policies are economic policies when the government enacts them, because funds must be allocated, and that is done through an economic lense. It's not circular logic, because an economic policy isn't necessarily a social policy. But I wouldn't expect you to understand basic logic.
(post is archived)