Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

782

If money can just be created, which causes inflation by lowering the value of all dollars, newly printed and already in circulation. Then why wouldn't destroying a dollar be at least as good (in terms of the dollar's value) as printing is bad?

Who would "pay" for it?

No one needs to pay for it? You're creating more than $1 value for every $1 you destroy. Are you not?

E;

I thought it was obvious, I guess I gave you guys too much credit. I clearly don't mean the few physical dollars being the ones to be destroyed unless necessary (wear/ tear etc.) But (((digital))) dollars create through the many systems all behind (((fractional reserve))) etc.

If money can just be created, which causes inflation by lowering the value of all dollars, newly printed and already in circulation. Then why wouldn't destroying a dollar be at least as good (in terms of the dollar's value) as printing is bad? >Who would "pay" for it? No one needs to pay for it? You're creating more than $1 value for every $1 you destroy. Are you not? #**E;** I thought it was obvious, I guess I gave you guys too much credit. I clearly don't mean the few physical dollars being the ones to be destroyed unless necessary (wear/ tear etc.) But (((digital))) dollars create through the many systems all behind (((fractional reserve))) etc.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (36).
[–] • 0 pt

Actual but it's based off of the value of that money. A $1 that can buy a can of Campbell soup has more purchasing power than $3 that can only buy one.

[–] • 0 pt

So purchasing power is based off of the value of actual money, but the value, being primary, is based off of perception of what? Purchasing power? This seems fucked up enough to be real.

[–] • 0 pt

No. You're mixing up "Value" with what's printed on the bill. They aren't the same in this context. Inflation doesn't change what's printed on a bill but inflation does change the purchasing power (value) of what is printed on that bill. Inflation causes that $20 bill to no longer be able to purchase as much as it did yesterday.

[–] • 0 pt

What I meant by “value” was how much a seller will give you for your twenty. I think by this, you mean purchasing power. So they are the same.
Here’s a hypothetical In the distopian future, You want to buy my cheese log with bullets. You offer me one bullet. I say screw you, give me five, thinking you have 1000 bullets and that there are about 10,000 bullets left among people who trade bullets. So the purchasing power of five bullets is one cheese log, at the moment. Problem is, unbeknownst to me, you fired of 995 bullets, and everyone else fired all of their bullets celebrating at the gay pride parade the night before. Then everyone was eaten by bears, so no one knows this happened. No one knows these are the last five rounds in existence. So the purchasing power of a bullet should be much higher.

So it seems that if a vendor is to know the actual value of a bullet, she/they/zkenox must know what’s going on, to a certain extent, with the rest of the currency.