WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

152

Did you think we've ever physically landed on the actual moon?

I don't think we're ever been to the moon and I don't think we've ever had the technology to get there.

That would make those astronaughts fucking liars, along with most past and present n.a.s.a. scientists.

Did you think we've ever physically landed on the actual moon? I don't think we're ever been to the moon and I don't think we've ever had the technology to get there. That would make those astronaughts fucking liars, along with most past and present n.a.s.a. scientists.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts (edited )

It is a man made object, going Mach 26, orbiting the earth for the past 24 years. Literally the greatest engineering achievement known to man. Surely, you can provide me with just one video of it being assembled. Or even how they got that crap up there, how they got it to that speed, how they catch up to it, or maybe just an explanation of how it doesn't hit any space junk ever if there is over 10,000 pieces. Just one video man.

[–] 7 pts

Surely, you can provide me with just one video of it being assembled

There are many hours of video of pretty much every module being added to it over the years and the fact that you don't know that pretty clearly shows you're not interested in the truth.

Or even how they got that crap up there

Rockets. Duh.

how they got it to that speed

Again, rockets. They burn fuel at very high temperatures, hot gases expand and can only escape from the nozzle at the bottom, this causes it to come out at very high speed, pushing the rocket up, then horizontally as it gets higher.

how they catch up to it

The same way they got it up there but with extra math. Also they don't catch up to it so much as aim in front of it, generally.

maybe just an explanation of how it doesn't hit any space junk ever if there is over 10,000 pieces.

Uh oh you've actually got me on this one. I can't explain how it never collides with space junk. Actually it should be colliding with at least a few pieces of space junk every year. Which it does.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Space is huge, mind-fuckingly huge. So it's not like they're flying through a gauntlet of debris.

That being said, however, the ISS actually does have to move out of the way of detected objects to avoid collisions from time to time.

[–] 2 pts

It is called "Orbital position". Geosynchronous satellites are much higher and the ISS is in a lower no geosync orbit. Other junk from early flights are at a different altitude above the surface of the earth. Persistent space junk is persistent because it stays in its orbital position. Junk that changes altitude falls to earth and burns up. The US Space command tracks every piece of space junk in orbit and plots its trajectory. There is over 100,000 pieces of junk. if they see a crossing path with the ISS, they can move ISS out of the way by changing its position or velocity slightly. With all that said, micro meteorites strike the ISS with regularity. It is designed for this. When astronauts spacewalk, they avoid touching the structure as these impacts leave razor sharp edges which could cut spacesuit gloves.

Ah they use solid fuel rockets? They have enough energy for that? How do they change direction with solid fuel rockets?

[–] 0 pt

Sometimes. Solid fuel rockets are used in boosters like the ones they used with the space shuttle and some other rockets. Main engines are always liquid fuel though, so it can be throttled. I don't know about every model of rocket used to construct the ISS but the space shuttle, and falcon 9 mainly steer with thrust vectoring on the way up, once they're high enough they have separate smaller thrusters used to maneuver in space. Those are always liquid fuel as far as I know.

[–] 3 pts

wtf is a video worth when they can be faked? Look at it with your own eyes and then call your eyes a liar.

254 miles up and you think you can see it... Meanwhile you can barely see a plane at 26,000 feet and they're basically the same size... Right dude.

[–] 5 pts

You ever look in the night sky and see a satellite moving across the sky? That thing is probably the size of small car and yet you see it 300 miles up. That's because light is reflected much easier at night. If you can see something the size of a car at night, you can see something the size of a football field.

So yeah he's right.

[–] 1 pt

254 strait up. you can see the moon right?

[–] 1 pt

Exactly. How could you see something that high, let alone 93 million miles away (distance to the sun)? /s

[–] 1 pt

Yes, you can. Even with a cheap telescope. You can actually see it with the naked eye, but it looks like a slow moving bright star as it moves across the sky. You can even get a time when you can see it where you live. https://spotthestation.nasa.gov/

[–] 0 pt

There is something up there. It's on video all over.

But you are right. There was zero fanfare. Zero discussing of it being built. The entire thing reeks of fraud and manipulation. There is ZERO reason to believe that the object moving through the sky is the same thing that modern media is telling us it is.

Modern society is so arrogant as to assume there is nothing occuring in the physical world that they don't have adaquate explination for.

[–] 0 pt

Later...

"Yeah, but that's a fake video of it being assembled. I want a REAL video."

Show it, I've only seen cg ones

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

Where is this fake video? I'd like to see it.