Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

135

I think the biggest mistake was allowing lobbying interests a sway in politics. Yet we still held this land to be for Europeans (who were here first, nothing against indians, that's a separate issue)

Now our number one threat would be the banking institutions, but i think kneecapping the already crumbling mainstream media would be first.

Maybe descend into anarchy. Strengthen the bonds of community.

Ideally I want a republic, but we need demographics on our side. What would be wrong with a philosopher ruler in a populist fascist vein, intent to only be in power for 5-10 years - send Jews to Israel (or as in the past, bar them from participating in certain occupations) deport non-whites, or set them up on reservations, maybe allow a minority of some respectable folks (NatSocs had a bit of unlikely allies in that sense).

From there restore a constitutional Republic. And the most ideal form of libertarianism

Would it be bloodless? Probably not.

I think the biggest mistake was allowing lobbying interests a sway in politics. Yet we still held this land to be for Europeans (who were here first, nothing against indians, that's a separate issue) Now our number one threat would be the banking institutions, but i think kneecapping the already crumbling mainstream media would be first. Maybe descend into anarchy. Strengthen the bonds of community. Ideally I want a republic, but we need demographics on our side. What would be wrong with a philosopher ruler in a populist fascist vein, intent to only be in power for 5-10 years - send Jews to Israel (or as in the past, bar them from participating in certain occupations) deport non-whites, or set them up on reservations, maybe allow a minority of some respectable folks (NatSocs had a bit of unlikely allies in that sense). From there restore a constitutional Republic. And the most ideal form of libertarianism Would it be bloodless? Probably not.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (74).
[–] • 23 pts

The only mistake the founders made in the Constitution, was the expectation that the Citizens would actually do what it takes to maintain and uphold it.

Demonstrably wrong.

[–] • 8 pts

The should have made it PROFITABLE to maintain the constitution, FOR THE INDIVIDUAL, instead of a punishment to not.

[–] • 4 pts

Interesting idea. Never heard that plan expressed before I don't think.

[–] • 6 pts

The 2nd amendment is our last line of defense, and time will tell

[–] • 3 pts

nah, these people living in America couldnt care less about the 2nd amendment. We'll be criminals and traders just like the first group of men that created this nation.

[–] • 3 pts

You get the Government you deserve.

[–] • 2 pts

I beg to differ, although with casualties expected

[–] • 0 pt

Would it have had more of a chance if it remained ethnically homogenous? just wondering

[–] • 1 pt

Probably. Humans are tribal.

[–] • 0 pt

They knew. I forget who said it, but one of the founders when asked to describe what they accomplished said "A republic, if you can keep it". There are a bunch of quotes like that, they knew the risk is that it could descend into degeneracy, that's why initially they limited the vote to white men and limited holding office to wealthy white men.

[–] • 2 pts

We said the same thing. They expected the Citizens to act.

The Citizens no longer act.

[–] • 1 pt

Benjamin Franklin said that. A woman citizen asked him, what is exactly they gave them. His response. " A republic, if you can keep it". Supposedly General Washington said the country wouldn't last 20 years before falling apart.