Cranial size doesn't prove much, many of the worlds smallest people have tested out at average IQ.
The better proof is that they never independently invented the wheel or bow.
Except you're wrong... Cranial size explains A TON. Groids lack prefrontal cortex which is responsible for;
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a central role in cognitive control functions....
Additionally skull size is causally linked to age (to a developmental standpoint, not bigger until death), not body size. Ever see a midget? They have big heads relative to their body compared to nonmidgets.
Brain size itself still isn't a correlation, elephants have far larger brains than people but only have the relative intelligence of chimps, if that, while crows have demonstrated chimp level intelligence.
Midgets have normal or big heads, sure but look at people with bone diseases who have cramped skulls, like hotwheels who founded 8chan, or the world's smallest man or woman in india and pakistan, genuinely gnomish people who are at baseline intelligence for their ethnic background.
I never said nigger brains weren't smaller or that they weren't ordered differently mind you, the small size, isn't and excuse or proof of anything other than perhaps evolution or crossbreeding, they lack mass and neuronal density. it's unfortunate research in this area has become taboo.
I recognizing I'm coming off a bit obtuse but you get my point, yes niggers are stupid but it's more like to be about their ancestry than the size of their brains.
Brain size itself still isn't a correlation, elephants have far larger brains than people but only have the relative intelligence of chimps, if that, while crows have demonstrated chimp level intelligence.
So you're moving the goalposts to a new sport? Whatever. Niggers are retarded for many reasons and one is proven to be the size of their skull. This isn't in question, why you're attempting to do so is funny.
the small size isn't and (???) excuse or proof
It's 100% a proof of the density of neurons and thus their intelligence. You're wrong. Bye.
Links for proof on that?
I can start you on the rabbit hole:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_dwarfism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ju_kj7aTwk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luc%C3%ADa_Z%C3%A1rate
An 1876 book published by Oxford University discussed a visit to Zaráte paid by several medical professionals, who could not certainly verify that she was twelve years old, but they could ascertain through her dental development that she was at least six years old. She weighed 14 pounds (6.4 kg) at her peak at age 20.[9] At the time, her height was measured at 20 in (51 cm) tall, and her calf was measured as 4 in (10 cm) in circumference, 1 in (2.5 cm) more than the thumb of an average adult man.[9] She was with her parents at the time and found to be healthy and intelligent, able to speak some English along with her native Spanish.[9]
They would not have called her intelligent in 1876 if she was a retard like many micro-cephalics.
Unfortunately I don't have any resources at hand talking about average intelligence, I don't save everything I read and index it; but while many primordial dwarfs are little more than vegetables, you can see clearly cognizant people who by all accounts appear to be of average intelligence exist within this group meaning that brains size itself isn't the exclusive factor in intelligence.
And we see this in nature as I mentioned elsewhere, elephants and crows are roughly in parity when it comes to intelligence and tool use and the difference in the size of their brains is massive.
Intelligence and it's principle elements are much more complex than brain size, EQ or IQ alone, though I fully admit that generally brain size does highly corelate to intelligence, however I would argue relative size of forebrain area is more important than over-all size. intelligence research is greatly deprived of funding due to the taboo of comparing niggers to anything else.
(post is archived)