Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

371

The configuration of this house is meaningless. It's 3 stories, above or below ground is irrelevant to the question. Let's say that the government decides to punish you for the acts of someone else that you cleaned up and gives the middle section away to some hostile family. The 3 males (Father + son + son) live on floor three and the 3 females live on the first floor. The new family lives on floor two but regularly rapes, pillages, and harms the females in the first floor.

You and your two sons decide to put an end to this. Are you breaking and entering the second floor if you do what you've decided and end up removing the second floor family from the property completely to protect your wife and daughters?

After you did so could you be said to have invaded floor 2?

The configuration of this house is meaningless. It's 3 stories, above or below ground is irrelevant to the question. Let's say that the government decides to punish you for the acts of someone else that you cleaned up and gives the middle section away to some hostile family. The 3 males (Father + son + son) live on floor three and the 3 females live on the first floor. The new family lives on floor two but regularly rapes, pillages, and harms the females in the first floor. You and your two sons decide to put an end to this. Are you breaking and entering the second floor if you do what you've decided and end up removing the second floor family from the property completely to protect your wife and daughters? After you did so could you be said to have invaded floor 2?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (13).
[–] • 0 pt

It's akin to asking "Is it ethical for prisoners in a gulag to aggress against other prisoners to protect themselves?" The answer is "None of them chose to be in that scenario because the tyrannical government forced it upon them. The government is at fault for everything, stop blaming subsets of its victims."

[–] • 1 pt

Hitler's next step was that. He (nonviolently and peacefully) removed jews from Germany.

[–] • 0 pt

If it involves the initiation of force, it isnt "non-violent".

[–] • 1 pt

There was no "force" as colloquially meant. Why are you siding with kikes? They were placed willingly mind you, in 5-star resorts. To claim otherwise is jewish and... yeah.