I can’t remember the case or the regulatory body in question (I think it was the EPA?)…but I believe that someone posted an article a month back that said SCOTUS ruled that the federal regulatory body in question couldn’t just change rules willy nilly based on executive branch preference..rather, the court ruled that such changes can only be made via the constitutional legislative process (ie, bill passes both houses and is signed into law by president).
The analysis that one of you posted basically said that the case set a precedent in one federal regulatory body (again, I forget which), but it has far reaching implications in that it now opens every other federal regulatory body to suit and having to abide by the same standards (think correction of overreach by ATF, EPA, Dept. of education, etc.)
Anyone know where that link or links are?
Much appreciated.
I can’t remember the case or the regulatory body in question (I *think* it was the EPA?)…but I believe that someone posted an article a month back that said SCOTUS ruled that the federal regulatory body in question couldn’t just change rules willy nilly based on executive branch preference..rather, the court ruled that such changes can only be made via the constitutional legislative process (ie, bill passes both houses and is signed into law by president).
The analysis that one of you posted basically said that the case set a precedent in one federal regulatory body (again, I forget which), but it has far reaching implications in that it now opens every other federal regulatory body to suit and having to abide by the same standards (think correction of overreach by ATF, EPA, Dept. of education, etc.)
Anyone know where that link or links are?
Much appreciated.
(post is archived)