WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Never. Because... "chat script, more human than a human." What are you even attempting to ask here? This is a retarded question with no context or setup.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Well, what does it mean to be "human" for you?

Are you one of those people that think, that every lump of cells that once in the future maybe could become a human already is a human? Do you think, that NPCs are to be considered as humans whose basic rights are equal to the basic rights to the lump of cells, whose rights equal the rights of any faggot you see when walking down the street, i.e. that murdering them is a bad thing?

IMHO "being human" means something like "being a person" i.e. intelligent beings being able to think and act and feel and live in accordance to human nature, i.e. the lump of cells is just that, and can be killed, and so can the NPC and the nigger.

However, since NPCs are considered as humans, even though they're just as programmed and stupid as a chatbot, and AI progresses, I think that there will be a point when chatbots will be higher on the ladder of personhood than your average NPC or even nigger, and, when turning off such a chatbot, you'll destroy a being that by all practical means is more deserving of human rights than the NPC is.

[–] 0 pt

Well, what does it mean to be "human" for you?

Holy... Is this the new (((What is a woman?)))

Are you one of those people that think, that every lump of cells that once in the future maybe could become a human already is a human?

There it is. (((you))) support (((aboriton)))

[–] 0 pt

Imagine getting baited into responding to some script generated word diarrhea.

[–] 0 pt

Kek. Getting minuses is fun, but do you really want to tell me, that you don't consider contemporary whites as inferior when compared to their ancestors? And of course that's partially genetic. So what do you want to do to at least have the white genome back to where it was maybe 200 years ago, that doesn't include ending the bloodlines of all those faggots and weaklings that are out there?

Maybe christian morals worked during the middle ages, then loving mother nature killed 40% off all children before they got 6 years old, but mother nature doesn't do that anymore, so the species degenerates if this moral system isn't put on the trashheap.

[–] 0 pt

Well, I don't even consider niggers as human, and I think, that it would be good if about 40% of all actual humans, with which I mean whites, would die after birth for eugenic reasons. Because that's the baserate under which evolution actually improves the species. I'm for darwinian conditions to breed out the weak and inferior, and those, that can't survive unless as slaves of society.

So of course I support idiots whose instincts have been weakened to such an degree that they want their bloodlines to end with them. More rights to them, especially abortion and babykilling rights. I'd love to use them to fuel my saltmines and slavebrothels, but as long as that's not an option, let's at least make sure that they end their bloodline on their own.

I don't understand this christian notion. It's fundamentally a religion for subhumans that breeds inferiority and weakness, and has been from the very beginning.

[–] 0 pt

You're a faggot. More minuses please.