Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

According to the Georgia Guide Pile-of-Rocks, the earth should only host 500 million people. That means 7.5 billion must die. That means 15 out of 16 must die all at once in some catastrophic event. (or slowly over the next few decades?) If monetary value was the only determining factor, how much money would you need to be in the top 5%? Based on net worth and income, to make the cut you'd have to be worth at least.... a million? wait... 10 million? I can't figure this out, but it's a number that can be calculated based on available figures. I'm just not savvy enough to figure out what the top 5% of net worth is. I'm pretty sure there aren't 500 million billionaires alive today.

According to the Georgia Guide Pile-of-Rocks, the earth should only host 500 million people. That means 7.5 billion must die. That means 15 out of 16 must die all at once in some catastrophic event. (or slowly over the next few decades?) If monetary value was the only determining factor, how much money would you need to be in the top 5%? Based on net worth and income, to make the cut you'd have to be worth at least.... a million? wait... 10 million? I can't figure this out, but it's a number that can be calculated based on available figures. I'm just not savvy enough to figure out what the top 5% of net worth is. I'm pretty sure there aren't 500 million billionaires alive today.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (58).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

A net worth of $93,170 U.S. is enough to make you richer than 90 percent of people around the world, Credit Suisse reports.

That's so insanely wrong. If it were done properly assets - debts most people would have very little, if anything. Also if the 'bottom' of the 'top' 10% has 93,000 then; 8,000,000,000 * .1 = 800,000,000 This top 10% has $74,400,000,000,000 which is hilariously wrong. in respect to being "honest" about the top 10%. Because we know that 10% to 1% is barely above 0 where 1% - .1% is middle class and .1% - .01% is rich and .01% - #1 ... well guess. The top 10% is skewed by the top .01%.

e; Further; = minimum $11,100,000 8,000,000,000 * .01 = 80,000,000 80,000,000 * 11,100,000 = 888,000,000,000,000

Now 888,000,000,000,000 / 800,000,000 (10% of the world) = 1,110,000 so just the top 1% has enough wealth to average the top 10% to $1,110,000 whic vastly outweighs your give $93k. Which further goes to show that from the top 10% to 1% could be worth $0 and the average of the top 10% would still be vastly above $93k.

ee; Now they don't do these number honestly and they do it this way, by including the very, very , very top (((bill gates))) (((musk))) (((house of saud))) (((rothschild))) specifically to demonize the middle class for the benefit of nonWhites.

[–] • 0 pt

I think this is considering net worth after liquidating all assets and settling debts. You're correct that most have very little after this exercise, it's a shame we don't get to see the "under 5k" group or $0 net worth groups.

2022 Numbers per Credit Suisse: 1.1% - >1M 11.1% - 100k - 1M 32.8% - 10k - 100k 55.0% - <10k

[–] • 0 pt

There is literally no way 800,000,000 individuals on Earth are worth $100k - $1 million. None. There is no possible way that (((credit score))) can be used to equate to wealth, as it doesn't at all do that. There is no possible way that over 4 billion people on Earth are worth more than $10,000 each. None. Just stop, you look ridiculous now.

[–] • 0 pt

I wonder if that screenshot really reflects "worldwide" or not - It's tough to trust a search engine returned exactly what you asked for unless it's clearly stated in the result.