Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

487

According to the Georgia Guide Pile-of-Rocks, the earth should only host 500 million people. That means 7.5 billion must die. That means 15 out of 16 must die all at once in some catastrophic event. (or slowly over the next few decades?) If monetary value was the only determining factor, how much money would you need to be in the top 5%? Based on net worth and income, to make the cut you'd have to be worth at least.... a million? wait... 10 million? I can't figure this out, but it's a number that can be calculated based on available figures. I'm just not savvy enough to figure out what the top 5% of net worth is. I'm pretty sure there aren't 500 million billionaires alive today.

According to the Georgia Guide Pile-of-Rocks, the earth should only host 500 million people. That means 7.5 billion must die. That means 15 out of 16 must die all at once in some catastrophic event. (or slowly over the next few decades?) If monetary value was the only determining factor, how much money would you need to be in the top 5%? Based on net worth and income, to make the cut you'd have to be worth at least.... a million? wait... 10 million? I can't figure this out, but it's a number that can be calculated based on available figures. I'm just not savvy enough to figure out what the top 5% of net worth is. I'm pretty sure there aren't 500 million billionaires alive today.

(post is archived)

[–] • 11 pts

You're not considering . The way things are looking, not only is the kleptocracy engineering a food shortage, killing 90% of the population and so on, they've been destroying fiat since 1913. Only in 1971 did the destruction accelerate.

Today, the same kleptocracy wants to do even more damage and dump traditional fiat with . This is where things get real interesting. You can't survive that.

Convert any fiat you have to guns, ammo, food, energy, precious metals, etc. Learn to barter. Traditional money won't exist.

Godspeed.

[–] • 3 pts

Traditional money won't exist.

Money is a good like anything else. If paper money and coins disappeared it wouldn't be long before you could deposit ammo, gold, silver, or other tangibles somewhere and receive proof of deposit in paper form. Then you could say, "I'll trade you this paper that lets you go pick up 1,000 rounds of 5.56 for that half-cow box of beef cuts." Boom. Money.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

They've been destroying the fiat

??? what are you going on about? They've been INSTITUTING a fiat in PLACE of wealth backed currency.

kleptocracy

Why the fuck are you using a new word to avoid naming the jew? Your entire comment is sadly (((questionable))) as fuck and that's very sad to me. Not only is it wrong, it's intentionally avoiding naming the true culprits, it's conflating the bad thing (jew based fiat) as the good thing.

e; Ill read your giant linked post later, when I can. Maybe there's info there I need to read.

ee; Rofl no. You conflate currency, money and assets for some weird reason. You demonize fiat as this horrible thing when at the end of the day ALL money (the thing that holds value and the thing that is used to tender payment for goods/services) are fiat based. Were you aware that NSDAP Germany used a fiat based money/currency? Want to know how? It was based on work hours, man hours etc. rather than some intangible idea made up by jews. Were you aware that past civilizations used fiat a fiat currency as well? That being muh shiny gold disc? Gold is fiat too. Extremely fiat based. Not only is it not the most conductive metal (hi silver, hi copper [you've been lied to]) but it being shiny and holding value because of that is fiat value. You will never escape fiat, you can't, it's not possible as it's the basis of how money/currency functions. There must be some accepted perception of the value of this piece of paper that's used for payment.

This is because the families controlling fiat currencies all over the world

It's ONE single family. You know the name of this family. Name it. Stop being so subversive dude. Why are you constantly conflating the truth? Why are you mincing around naming those at fault?

cryptocurrency

Is jewish and glows from top to bottom, on the inside and outside. Has no benefits for anyone but the jew(s) in control of it and it's systems. Anyone blinded by cryptocurrency is extremely dumb.

Communism, socialism and capitalism

More conflation... WHY DO YOU DO THIS? Socialism and communism aren't the same types of thing. Socialism and capitalism aren't the same types of thing. Communism and capitalism aren't the same types of thing. The jew fears capitalism as an economic system as it bases value on work rather than what the rothschild family wants.

Why switching back to an asset backed currency will solve most of our problems.

No. That only adds another layer of deviation from value. Base it off of man hours, off of work, not off of some perceived value of assets. That's entirely wrong and entirely manipulable by jewish bankers.

In the end your write up is a clusterfuck of nothingness that attempts to support jewish control. Why?

[–] • 1 pt

There are too many jews to name. Most people here understand the euphemism. I mean they are destroying the value of fiat.

[–] • 0 pt

There are too many jews to name.

So "jews in power" is good enough. Rather than cucking out and hiding the truth.

Most people here understand the euphemism.

No. Most people do not understand it even a little bit and it's because of people like you who refuse to name the jew. The jew fears being named.

I mean they are destroying the value of fiat.

So now fiat is a good thing that must be protected?

[–] • 0 pt

Hey, hey, whoa... easy on the anti-semitism there, pal. You want to get this site in trouble?

[–] • 1 pt

No. I don't care. If it comes to that point AOU needs to incorporate in Marie Byrd Land and tell all world governments to fuck off.

[–] • 10 pts (edited )

If you kill 7.5 billion people in a rahter short perior of time on this planet you get a planet where money is pretty much worthless

It's before the culling that you need money (fiat), because during the culling it's going to be a mess of biblical proportions... I mean try to picture 7.5 BILLION people dying over a decade... You can't. The closest thing you can picture is madmax...

Now picture yourself in madmax with "money"... Or even gold... What are you going to do with that? Nobody is going to give two shits about your stamp collection and your shiny rocks

You need real assets, such as guns and a fucking bunker saddam hussein style, and you need them BEFORE the culling starts...

7.5 billion people...

It's the fucking apocalypse

Now idk if that's going to happen, but if it does, chances are, the survivors will get a giant steaming pile of shit for planet. Take france for instance, 50 nuclear powerplants... Imagine what it's going to deliver in terms of pollution without maintenance... Good luck with that

And that's just for france's nuclear powerplants.... Consider the rest, other countries, BSL4 facilities, etc...

[–] • 0 pt

There has got to be a better way. A little fucking lens can make fire if you direct sunlight onto a pile of dried grass. Trees are solar energy storage. Burning wood is zero sum energy. ...It's recycling on a global scale. But you can boil water with solar energy. Boiled water produces steam. Steam is a source of power that we have discarded for oil. . What do they mean by "coal-fired" nuclear plants?

[–] • 2 pts

I dont follow, where are you getting at?

[–] • 0 pt

All energy we produce/consume on earth is inherently "renewable". Remember Carl Sagan saying, "we are all made of star-stuff"? It's the same philosophy. Why should we worry about oil or nuclear power plants when every bit of energy produced on earth is in a restricted environment confined by our orbit around the sun?

We are living on a sweet, sweet planet. The Good Earth is Good.

But if every human on earth had to be killed except for the richest of the rich, would you survive?

[+] [deleted] • 3 pts
[–] • 2 pts

money wont save you.

[–] • 2 pts

When the shit hits the fan, money won't buy you anything.

[–] • 2 pts

If you have land with fresh water, an abundance of trees for firewood, crops to eat and feed animals like chickens who will produce eggs and a means of predator control (and fend of raiders) you wouldn't much money. (assumes your tools, ovens etc are of the highest quality).

[–] • 4 pts

A man plants an apple tree in an open field knowing he will never taste the fruit.

[–] • 2 pts

I think I just defined "whiteness".

[–] • 0 pt

If he is old and doesn't have 10 years to wait for the tree to grow enough to produce the first crop.

[–] • 2 pts
[–] • 0 pt

Road Warrior. 0K.

[–] • 2 pts

Well madmax I & II are a pretty accurate depiction of how things might devolve overtime, with a global civilizational collapse as background

Particularly the first one, when the world is halfway between civilization and total collapse

[–] • 2 pts

Not just top income. But do you live within your means. But it depends on how the collapse happens. Having massive debt can also be good if in the finale collapse no one gives a shit about money anymore. But did you go into debt to surround yourself with good resources and tools, or blow it on crap.

Good people are getting wiped out, shitty people are getting wiped out. Some niggers will get by on dumb luck, while some smart guy gets taken out being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Some are being targeted while others will naturally die off. It's at all levels. Being rich won't save you, being well prepared won't save you, but it will give you better odds. Who really wants to survive that shit anyway. Just do the best you can with what you've got.

[–] • 1 pt

Money isn't what you need to survive the collapse, you need skills and supplies

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

The only bearing money would have in this situation is the ability to hoard supplies beforehand. People who did hoard supplies would ultimately be betrayed by the people who facilitated the effort.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Yeshua is coming back well before they get us down to 500 milion.

Otherwise, I generally agree with what you wrote.

[–] • 0 pt

Based on net worth and income, to make the cut you'd have to be worth at least.... a million? wait... 10 million? I can't figure this out, but it's a number that can be calculated based on available figures.

ROFL

You have VASTLY warped idea of money. To m ake it in the top 5% you'd need a few thousand dollars. That's it.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

A net worth of $93,170 U.S. is enough to make you richer than 90 percent of people around the world, Credit Suisse reports.

That's so insanely wrong. If it were done properly assets - debts most people would have very little, if anything. Also if the 'bottom' of the 'top' 10% has 93,000 then; 8,000,000,000 * .1 = 800,000,000 This top 10% has $74,400,000,000,000 which is hilariously wrong. in respect to being "honest" about the top 10%. Because we know that 10% to 1% is barely above 0 where 1% - .1% is middle class and .1% - .01% is rich and .01% - #1 ... well guess. The top 10% is skewed by the top .01%.

e; Further; = minimum $11,100,000 8,000,000,000 * .01 = 80,000,000 80,000,000 * 11,100,000 = 888,000,000,000,000

Now 888,000,000,000,000 / 800,000,000 (10% of the world) = 1,110,000 so just the top 1% has enough wealth to average the top 10% to $1,110,000 whic vastly outweighs your give $93k. Which further goes to show that from the top 10% to 1% could be worth $0 and the average of the top 10% would still be vastly above $93k.

ee; Now they don't do these number honestly and they do it this way, by including the very, very , very top (((bill gates))) (((musk))) (((house of saud))) (((rothschild))) specifically to demonize the middle class for the benefit of nonWhites.

[–] • 0 pt

I think this is considering net worth after liquidating all assets and settling debts. You're correct that most have very little after this exercise, it's a shame we don't get to see the "under 5k" group or $0 net worth groups.

2022 Numbers per Credit Suisse: 1.1% - >1M 11.1% - 100k - 1M 32.8% - 10k - 100k 55.0% - <10k

[–] • 0 pt

I wonder if that screenshot really reflects "worldwide" or not - It's tough to trust a search engine returned exactly what you asked for unless it's clearly stated in the result.

Load more (6 replies)