Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

I dont think it matters that much personally, however many women complain they have a "hard" time getting into the field, or passing interviews. in comparison, i just showed my gf an interview of mine, and i was cool as a cucumber, composed, asked questions, maintained my limits on what i didn't know, and did know, and solved the problem at hand. in comparison, this woman i know cracks under pressure, has severe anxiety, puts too much stress on randomized, inconsequential events, and does really poorly on interviews. i would say this is not sexism though, it stems from the fact that most if not all women simply do not belong in the workplace, at all. they are simply not equipped to handle the large amount of stressors

I dont think it matters that much personally, however many women complain they have a "hard" time getting into the field, or passing interviews. in comparison, i just showed my gf an interview of mine, and i was cool as a cucumber, composed, asked questions, maintained my limits on what i didn't know, and did know, and solved the problem at hand. in comparison, this woman i know cracks under pressure, has severe anxiety, puts too much stress on randomized, inconsequential events, and does really poorly on interviews. i would say this is not sexism though, it stems from the fact that most if not all women simply do not belong in the workplace, at all. they are simply not equipped to handle the large amount of stressors

(post is archived)

[–] • 11 pts

Women are innately prone to deception. They “multitask,” meaning they do lots of things poorly, unless held to task. They don’t understand how to estimate. They don’t know how to prioritize.

They are unfit for a workforce other than as menial workers.

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts

Women are innately prone to deception. They “multitask,” meaning they do lots of things poorly, unless held to task. They don’t understand how to estimate. They don’t know how to prioritize.

You must be married a long time too.

lol!

[–] [deleted] • 6 pts

This is one of the same users or bots that constantly post on ask/tell and then delete the account and repeat. Stop feeding them.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

This is the wall of text guy that strings words and letters together for easy user names.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

brothersinchrist was a recent one and started posting in the Christian sub once called out.

[–] • 1 pt

Good info. I don’t track that stuff.

[–] • 0 pt

Who cares. The post is interesting and half the users on the entire internet are bots.

[–] • 0 pt

I was curious what the intent was with an obvious and blatant lie.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

This has been going on for months(marchish) and poal has been falling for it hook, line and sinker. Surprised your autist ass hasn't noticed.

[–] • 0 pt

Have you met my wife or something? Lmao

[–] • 6 pts

They definitely dont belong in software development as a general standard. I can say from experience.

[–] • 1 pt

They think a man just decides to become a software developer overnight, where in reality they've been playing with computers since they were small children.

[–] • 1 pt

They also dont think with the rigid logical flow that lends itself to programming. Typically.

[–] • 1 pt

These days anytime you see a channel with a woman deep into programming or engineering, it's probably actually a man.

[–] • 1 pt

Trying to get women interested in software development (I'm not talking about being interested in the money or remote work) is like trying to get men who aren't fags interested in purses.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

That's got nothing to do with sex. If she's not good under pressure and sucks at interviews she needs to actively practice interviewing and work on what she doesn't know. If you're really trying to help her then help her with what you just pointed out.

[–] • 1 pt

Women in the workplace was one of several death knell for societies that allow this transgression.

Correlated with crashing birthrate and children being badly raised

[–] [deleted] • -1 pt

Women have a right to pursue health wealth and happiness just as any man. Declining birthrates aren't a female invention, if it were then you'd see declining birthrates in all ethnic groups and you don't. Children being badly raised could be in part caused by the man's inability to financially support his family and so on and so forth.

It's fascinating how many men on Poal seem to despise women. Too bad for you. And the women in your life.

[–] • 1 pt

Tdlr destruction of liberal cunt above. (fuck off back to reddit btw. Your kind stains all).

-women are not happy in the workplace according to every study ever.

-women earn wealth through marriage.

-extinction is too high a price for happiness and wealth anyway.

-yes career women don't have children. See biology. It's called science and opportunity cost

-biggest cause of child poverty by far is women not marrying their children's fathers. Statistics

[–] • 0 pt

Hi cunt. Women can and do get wealth via men. Men work. Women spend it.

Women don't add anything to the workforce that men cannot do better.

But women in the workforce comes at a huge opportunity cost. Life itself. If Hitler had of told jewish women to have careers instead of babies you liberal cunts would know what he is up to. But since we were the target of the warfare program you are oblivious.

75% of all children in poverty have single mums.

Every race with women in the workplace has declining birthrate and those that don't don't.

Typical cunt. Oppose femivile propaganda and you must hate women.

But given that women at home with their kids are far happier than career extinction chasers then factually it is your kind that hates us and hates women.

The good news is this program dies with this society and the surviving women are returning home where they must be

[–] • 2 pts

Women equal poor unit cohesion , in the Military , workforce , or any area really . They expend enormous energy on gossip , scheming against other coworkers and just stirring up nonsensical bullshit.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

part of me wonders how important gender really is

it stems from the fact that most if not all women simply do not belong in the workplace, at all. they are simply not equipped to handle the large amount of stressors

Choose one, you can't have it both ways.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

The wording is confusing, but the gender does not matter, the behavior does. In this case, it is not the fact that a woman is a woman hence no job, it is the fact that the behavior inherent to women is poor to most high stress jobs. Hence, gender, the concept has absolutely nothing to do with the equation. It's the same reason no one wants to hire niggers, the color isn't the problem, its the pattern of behavior attached to the color

[–] • 1 pt

Pretty sure we all knew that. Not like most reasonable people think gender or skin color GUARANTEES anything about a person. Just suggests a likelihood for certain character traits.

[–] • 0 pt

There are shitty white workers and a few good nig nogs. It's like 4/5 the white worker is okay to good and 9/10 the nig nog is okay to shitty. You get the occasional good nig nog worker and the occasional shitty white worker. It's just a matter of odds. I would also recommend using whether they're a fat ass or not. With fats you get laziness and fattitude (i.e. I can't change anything) pretty often. I did work with a fat black woman once, and all she had to do was fill out paperwork. She was always talking on the phone or listening to music. The office said our tickets and paperwork were perfect. I couldn't believe it.

[–] • 1 pt

...however many women complain they have a "hard" time getting into the field,...

No. Bullshit. It is quite literally the opposite. Females have it easy as F to get into STEM field anything. Even with lacking experience and credentials they'll often and usually get picked over males. Now if it's a nigger or spic, jew etc. Then that's a lottery ticket.

Why are you lying?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

That's Prolactin, the hormone that helps a woman produce milk. It makes it difficult for women to handle stress, gives them anxiety and depression at a higher rate than men and leaves them frantic so its difficult to focus on one thing at a time. It also tires them out more easily. Prolactin is highest when she is lactating or in the birthing process but it is present before and long after that window closes. It stays with them for the rest of their life. Yes, it's a good reason why women shouldn't be in the workplace, they are biologically unfit for it.

Past generations knew this and made concessions for women to make it easier for them but they were the ones that demanded we ignore it and expect them to work 40+ hours a week all their lives.

[–] • 1 pt

There is no such thing as women and men being "just friends" unless they already tried dating/sex in the past and it was a failure.

She is either an ex, or you are a simp.

[–] • 1 pt

There are guys that suck at interviews too, and women that are great at them. It's more about your ability to act with the right amount of confidence and say what they want to hear.

[–] • 1 pt

Women shouldn't be in the workforce. They need to be caring for a home and White babies.

[–] • 1 pt

I'm open to compromise and let them work half days after 40.

We've got a couple women who are as good as the mediocre men. But the one who's in her 20s would be way more productive if she was barefoot and pregnant.

[–] • 1 pt

And it sounds like she's manipulated you into trying to help her do her job properly.

Load more (4 replies)