WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

I understand they used the concept of root races and genetics didn't exist yet, which is why individual ancestry was important. But obviously someone had done the racial research which allowed, for example, honorary aryan, or more precisely, asiatic-aryan status, for the Japanese.

Is there anything available which provides their racial analysis of the various peoples? Or was it as simple as, if a swastikas appears in their past, they are worthy of consideration? Status? Whatever? How did they account for population migrations and complete demographic replacements over time?

I understand they used the concept of root races and genetics didn't exist yet, which is why individual ancestry was important. But obviously someone had done the racial research which allowed, for example, honorary aryan, or more precisely, asiatic-aryan status, for the Japanese. Is there anything available which provides their racial analysis of the various peoples? Or was it as simple as, if a swastikas appears in their past, they are worthy of consideration? Status? Whatever? How did they account for population migrations and complete demographic replacements over time?

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )
[–] 1 pt

Ty. Will check it out. Way too small on this device.

Have anything which discusses methodology or reasons on the gray areas?

[–] 1 pt

I still fantasize about a Sorb national movement taking back their lands and their descendants rediscovering, claiming and promoting their ancestry.

[–] 1 pt

And get obsessed with fitness, so they become known as Absorbs.