WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

274

I don't consider the Scottish Claymore practical. The English long sword is worthy. The Roman Gladius is also of interesting.

What do you think? Which Aryan, Anglo-Saxon swords are worthy of renown?

I don't consider the Scottish Claymore practical. The English long sword is worthy. The Roman Gladius is also of interesting. What do you think? Which Aryan, Anglo-Saxon swords are worthy of renown?

(post is archived)

[+] [deleted] 10 pts
[–] 6 pts

I don’t know much about swords…but I carry a mighty fine pocket knife…and I find that I get along with other people who also carry a daily pocket knife. So I am upvoting this.

[–] 0 pt

Was going to say it’d probably prefer a switch blade that could be concealed completely in the hand and activated with a button.

[–] 4 pts

I think any serious white man needs a longsword.

If you are a big motherfucker like 6´3 uber aryan a great sword....if shorter a bastard sword.

If you are a turbo manlet then something like a frodo gay short sword or roman sword.

[–] 0 pt

Even shorter people can use a proper longsword if they have any semblance of knowing what the fuck to do with one.

[–] 1 pt

bro, just no, no

[–] 0 pt

Are you trained in longsword combat?

[–] 4 pts

The Gladius was in use for centuries, and with it the Roman legions conquerored the world ... all the world that mattered, anyway. It's simple, it's cheap, it's low-tech (does not demand high-quality steel), and it works. I always recommend it as a home self-defense weapon. If my house were invaded, and I didn't have a gun, I would take the Gladius as my second choice. It's a close-and-personal kind of sword -- short enough to swing in tight quarters. It's a good stabbing weapon, but at the same time it chops like a meat cleaver. The hilt is designed to not come out of your hand. Ideally, you would want a knife for your left hand to parry with -- something with a good, strong crossguard to catch blades.

[–] 2 pts

There's actually a lot of arguments that seem to keep coming back to the gladius.

[–] 0 pt

It was even revived during the Renaissance. Pike formations loved it. I forget what the Swiss called it but the Landsknecht called it the Katzbalger ("cat skinner"), because it was what you went to when things got really close.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

The Spatha was in use for hundreds of years and replaced the Gladius

Used by the Romans, Vikings, and Normans

[–] 0 pt

Cavalry weapon. Gladius probably better for modern purposes.

The Spatha is a straight broadsword. I don't think you'd wield it mounted if you could help it

[–] 3 pts

I have this bad boy:

https://www.darksword-armory.com/medieval-weapon/medieval-swords/the-baron-sword-1550/

It's very well weighted and intended more for thrusting than slashing.

I bought this off of etsy and I use it as a beater sword: https://files.catbox.moe/pyq9rr.jpg

I had to alter the scabbard because the belt loop is retarded.

[–] 2 pts

The viking in me says, you're sword is inferior to an axe.

But if a sword is what you desire, the Gladius is the easiest to use with a shield.

[–] 0 pt

you're sword is inferior to an axe.

Oh yes. Spear, axe, hammer, mace, all superior to the sword. The sword is weapon of personal defense or specific tactic.

[–] 2 pts

Cold Steel Boar Spear. 82 " overall, 18" of which comprise the business end. Thrust, slice, cut, beat, gouge or missle your sword wielding opponent with the impunity of distance.

Load more (20 replies)