WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

So...there are literally videos of Biden, Fauci, and others guaranteeing that if a person got the fake vaccine they would not get sick from the wuflu.

So, now that Fauci, Biden, and other guarantors have all fallen ill themselves are there grounds for a lawsuit? Or did their claims give them plausible deniability. This is bullshit. I am kind of tired of it.

So...there are literally videos of Biden, Fauci, and others guaranteeing that if a person got the fake vaccine they would not get sick from the wuflu. So, now that Fauci, Biden, and other guarantors have all fallen ill themselves are there grounds for a lawsuit? Or did their claims give them plausible deniability. This is bullshit. I am kind of tired of it.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Any lawsuit would need to pierce the veil of Pfizer's blanket liability protection by showing that they engaged in fraud. The Emergency Use Authorization application used the term for "prevention." In any suit there would be endless wrangling about the meaning of the word "prevention." Did Pfizer know that the vaccines did not stop disease? Does the word "prevention" encompass symptom reduction? Bottom line, a liability / tort lawsuit woud be a "tough row to hoe." There has been some movement on pushing back against the mandates.

https://newspress.com/court-orders-air-force-to-not-impose-vaccine-mandate-on-members-with-religious-exemptions/