WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

289

So...there are literally videos of Biden, Fauci, and others guaranteeing that if a person got the fake vaccine they would not get sick from the wuflu.

So, now that Fauci, Biden, and other guarantors have all fallen ill themselves are there grounds for a lawsuit? Or did their claims give them plausible deniability. This is bullshit. I am kind of tired of it.

So...there are literally videos of Biden, Fauci, and others guaranteeing that if a person got the fake vaccine they would not get sick from the wuflu. So, now that Fauci, Biden, and other guarantors have all fallen ill themselves are there grounds for a lawsuit? Or did their claims give them plausible deniability. This is bullshit. I am kind of tired of it.

(post is archived)

[–] 10 pts

In case you didn't know, justice system is gigakiked.

Deaths from vax are not getting life insurance payouts because they are being called suicide. If that isn't kiked, I don't know what is.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Not a chance in hell, my friend.

[–] 0 pt

Not a chance in hell, my friend

I know...but it is fucked. If it was any of us we would be in federal prison.

[–] 1 pt

Logic, reason and laws no longer apply. You may follow laws and reason but they don’t, it’s a transition to the next stage…. By the time you figure out what really needs done, it’s too late. No reasonable person believes any of their garbage anymore, vaccines, climate change, shortages…. But enough of the sheepy masses do to keep the train rolling a bit longer. How far is anyone’s guess.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

I am under the impression that most Americans are unaware that there is some weird case law out there that indemnifies the government running experiments on unsuspecting citizens, and are not liable for any damages done. Or that in cases where that wouldn't protect the government, the courts have typically provided cover.

I can't find that information on a quick search at the moment, but just look at this short list of fucked up stuff that the government has gotten away with. Much of this has been washed to make it seem more benign.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States#Legal,_academic_and_professional_policy

Edit: I looked around more and I may be incorrect on that no liability thing. The case I was recalling was the operation sea-spray case in which the court just denied the bacteria can cause pneumonia (which we now know it does.)

[–] 1 pt

I am under the impression that most Americans are unaware that there is some weird case law out there that indemnifies the government running experiments on unsuspecting citizens

I think that is the Nuremburg Code. Basically, if you subject yourself to the same experiment you can do whatever you want.

[+] [deleted] 1 pt
[–] 1 pt

I think they will give you a refund if you are not 100% satisfied.

[–] 0 pt

I think they will give you a refund if you are not 100% satisfied.

A refund of free is nothing dammit. I want some shekels. The free donuts, beer, and weed are all gone.

[–] 2 pts

Oh, in that case you would actually owe them a donut and a nickel bag. Pay your debt, goy.

[–] 1 pt

Oh, in that case you would actually owe them a donut and a nickel bag. Pay your debt, got.

I got 50 free donuts. I don't have a donut machine. How am I supposed to pay that back. My life is falling apart. Is there any way I could bend over a little more instead?

[–] 1 pt

Any lawsuit would need to pierce the veil of Pfizer's blanket liability protection by showing that they engaged in fraud. The Emergency Use Authorization application used the term for "prevention." In any suit there would be endless wrangling about the meaning of the word "prevention." Did Pfizer know that the vaccines did not stop disease? Does the word "prevention" encompass symptom reduction? Bottom line, a liability / tort lawsuit woud be a "tough row to hoe." There has been some movement on pushing back against the mandates.

https://newspress.com/court-orders-air-force-to-not-impose-vaccine-mandate-on-members-with-religious-exemptions/

[–] 1 pt

Come on man, sorry not sorry buddy but every Adult signed an informed consent waiver permitting the voluntary injection of this experimental gene based therapy ... Cavet Empor or something something ...

[–] 1 pt

every Adult signed an informed consent waiver

I think a lot of people could argue their consent was not fully informed. A lot of people got it under duress as well.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah i know, but still one could argue they were informed since it's well established All vaccines carry risk (vaccine manufactures working term for 'Rare' is literally something that doesn't happen 100% of the time) and the fact it was called an 'experimental vaccine' in msm at the start of the rollout for several months, the individual signing is in default if they hadn't made themselves fully informed when waivering responsibility that they were in a mass clinical study of an investigational vaccine - and any signals are simply being 'monitored' by health authorities. 'Experiment !!'.

' A lot of people got it under duress as well. '

Yeah i understand this but i'm also conflicted - at any time they could have simply refused. Probably a bad analogy - If work announced the mafia wants half your paycheck each week you stay - do you stay or move somewhere else ??. Ultimately why are people doing something they don't really want to do ??. Lemmings.

The argument 'To pay bills , feed my family' is a solid one, but again if every time you worked you had to order a family out on the street for non payment of bills - would you - in order for your family to survive. Free will vs 'just following orders - doing my job' don't really fly imho.