Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

Quick easy simple ask Poal post. I just have always heard that King Arthur was a sort of filler fiction. Apparently during that time in England not was much known or recorded. Why is that and was it just a peaceful slow time with nothing exciting. It just seems maybe something is hiding in plain site. Just curious is all and I hope y'all niggers have a good Weekend. Thanks

Quick easy simple ask Poal post. I just have always heard that King Arthur was a sort of filler fiction. Apparently during that time in England not was much known or recorded. Why is that and was it just a peaceful slow time with nothing exciting. It just seems maybe something is hiding in plain site. Just curious is all and I hope y'all niggers have a good Weekend. Thanks

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (15).
[–] • 2 pts

Read Geoffrey of Monmouth. Arthur was a real king from ad 521.

[–] • 2 pts

Geoffrey of Monmouth was the guy who wrote the original Arthur tale. As far as I know, noting he wrote is considered to be actual history. It's like watching Braveheart for information about the Battle of Stirling.

[–] • 1 pt

This is correct. We know he existed. We don't know much about him, his rule, or his kingdom.

[–] • 0 pt

Interesting I will look into it. Thank you.