WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

Quick easy simple ask Poal post. I just have always heard that King Arthur was a sort of filler fiction. Apparently during that time in England not was much known or recorded. Why is that and was it just a peaceful slow time with nothing exciting. It just seems maybe something is hiding in plain site. Just curious is all and I hope y'all niggers have a good Weekend. Thanks

Quick easy simple ask Poal post. I just have always heard that King Arthur was a sort of filler fiction. Apparently during that time in England not was much known or recorded. Why is that and was it just a peaceful slow time with nothing exciting. It just seems maybe something is hiding in plain site. Just curious is all and I hope y'all niggers have a good Weekend. Thanks

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

What was happening was the conquest of (most of) Britain by the Saxons and Angles. England ("Angleland") came into existence through this invasion. Arthur was originally a mythical (possibly - but not certainly - based on a real person) Brythonic king who temporarily drove back the Saxons. But most of the stories associated with him are either later innovations or old but originally unrelated myths that were reworked to benefit from the popularity of Arthurian literature in the High Middle Ages. Arthur was portrayed as a late medieval knight which - if he existed at all - he surely was not.

There's little written history (or any written material at all) from Western Europe in that period (which is why it's called a Dark Age). What we do have was mostly written by monks and mainly concerned with religious subjects like the lives of saints.

[–] 0 pt

Very well put and explained and I do remember being told about the Monks of the Dark Ages who'm recorded much of everything as well as the Gothic Cathedrals which to me are stunning.