The answers you would hypothetically get would most likely me convoluted or dishonest. Fertile women are most attracted to height, looks, money and status. Period. Anything less and they are settling.
Women want a dominant man. Aggressive and brash from a guy whose physically fit. They want their kids to survive.
You don't need "looks", "money", or "status" you just need to be brutal.
Your response is the kind of answers that someone who never has had any pussy gives.
Height is dominance dumbass. And looks equals good genes meaning healthy offspring, and money is the resources that all help “their kids to survive.”
You think women want a 5’3” brutal manlet with a recessed jaw trying to dominate them? No! They want a 6’3” Scandinavian Chad with awesome blue eyes pulling their hair in doggy position.
Idk why that faggot is arguing with you. Personality can add to physical attractiveness, it doesn’t replace it. If dude isn’t 6’2”+, huwhite with a strong jawline, symmetrical and heathy looking face he’ll never be considered hot. Having enough money to afford a family is a must though he doesn’t have to be rich. Poors can be hot sometimes, it’s best to skip them for the sake of future kids. No fatties either. I didn’t settle and much to my annoyance women drool over my husband when we’re out together. I know what we all want. :/ Guys might be able to get laid or find a wife without being hot. Average looking men with lots of money or good personalities will never get the attention he does. Women can trick themselves into settling, but their eyes will light up differently when they see a guy who’s actually attractive.
You sound like the kind of faggot who runs around 'bragging' about getting an A in sociology but wants to be internet edgy at the same time.
You've never been an alpha. It's obvious. I doubt you've ever been laid by a girl you've sought. (Very possible you've been pity fucked by some coal burner though)
Idk i know two 5'3 dudes who do quite well because they run their mouth and hold themaelves properly, plus goto the gym often
I would phrase the same thing slightly differently:
Female survival strategy requires a man that is, simultaneously, good at warfare (dangerous) and a good father (beta qualities) and a great physical specimen that can produce healthy babies (good looking).
Those three qualities are am impossibility statistically so women are always trying to optimize for the possibility of maximizing all three. This explains monkey branching as well as why they will seek the dangerous guy for fun but settle down with a beta.
Evolution is a mother fucker.
Looks are meaningless when it comes to women and what they find "attractive". Looks are only meaningful for women when it comes to other women.
'Good-looking' firstly means 'he will make my GFs jealous'.
Even if they get a man with money, looks, height, and status, they still feel like they are settling
If Brad Pitt and Johnny Depp can't tame roasties, what hope do WE have??
Hopelessness is freeing.
(post is archived)