you are right more often assuming the exact opposite of the official narrative
At the very least you should always assume that, whatever the "Officially Approved Narrative" is, about anything, that is the ONE thing that is absolutely guaranteed to NOT be true.
They even lie about things they don't even have to lie about, even when the truth would better serve their purposes, just for the purpose of generating stray voltage, competing narratives, and undermining the overall signal to noise ratio. If all "truth" is equally suspect, then all information flow is treated as if it is equally false.
At that point people could scream the absolute truth straight into a sheep's face, with live video attached, and the sheep just treats it as part of the usual background noise. And nothing is more objectively "true" or "false" than anything else. And that is the objective. If you can't exercise absolute control over the message, then skew the signal to the point where nothing is trusted. Including the objective truth.
Refer to the media's behavior throughout the entirety of the Kyle Rittenhouse case, from start to finish. It provides a near real-time textbook example of this.
Good explanation
Whatever a legislative bill is named, its actually the opposite in reality.
There is a whole chapter in a book by a former painter with a small mustache about propaganda and his conclusion is that people fall into 3 camps:
1) Those who believe everything the media/state tell them.
2) Those who believe nothing/the opposite of what the media/state tell them.
3) Those who independently research and actively infer motivations on a case by case basis.
He goes on to say that type 2 disbelievers are just as easy to manipulate as type 1 believers provided you target them specifically and invert your message to have the intended effect. Group 3 are the hardest to propagandize to and the state has to expend the most effort to manipulate these people with bogus studies and long, drawn out campaigns that transcend simple media, slogans, reporting, etc. He goes into far more depth about these groups and how people come to these conclusions but it should suffice to say that you should always be a group 3 thinker, jewish tricks are far more sophisticated than "It's all lies." and even when you reach the wrong conclusion it forces them to burn more money and play more cards to convince fewer people.
(post is archived)