You didn't explain why this line of thought is wrong. You presented a deflection.
You didn't explain why this line of thought is wrong. You presented a deflection.
I did not deflect. I pointed out the flaws in your line of thought as I see it. "Because we do it to animals" in of itself is not a justification for anything. It is a false correlation.
I did not deflect. I pointed out the flaws in your line of thought as I see it. "Because we do it to animals" in of itself is not a justification for anything. It is a false correlation.
No, you are deflecting. Let's simplify it - do you think women should be forced to have a child with every male that wants to have a child with her (and vice-versa)? We already are doing selective breeding, a male chooses the female he wishes to have children with and does if she chooses to have a child with him. The big leap is eugenics is controlled by someone else.
The West is technically practicing eugenics currently, we call it welfare.
No, you are deflecting. Let's simplify it - do you think women should be forced to have a child with every male that wants to have a child with her (and vice-versa)? We already are doing selective breeding, a male chooses the female he wishes to have children with and does if she chooses to have a child with him. The big leap is eugenics is controlled by someone else.
The West is technically practicing eugenics currently, we call it welfare.
(post is archived)