I don't believe in energy directed weapon theory, because that's unnecessary/overblown for that sort of stunt
I don't believe in lighting https://youtu.be/24HL_T-9Vfw?t=3 because well, that's what it looks like to begin with
>I agree with Bobby Ashley. Having first hand experience working with munitions in the army and working with EOD while in Afganistan. This is a shape charge type explosion. All the debris was projected in one direction and didn’t damage the other structures. As for the light intensity change it’s simply the existing light reflecting off the dust. They haven’t released the before footage because it’s an ongoing investigation. And they need to preserve evidence. However the way this was professionally done I doubt the people involved were dumb enough to park a vehicle nearby and would know about the cameras and field of view and approach on foot. A simple check of weather would show no storms or lightning strikes anywhere near the area on that night. Also a lightning strike would throw debris in all directions and would brighten the entire area. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YC7eEMjvA_0
The only part with which I don't agree with the comment above is the "They haven’t released the before footage because it’s an ongoing investigation. And they need to preserve evidence. However the way this was professionally done I doubt the people involved were dumb enough to park a vehicle nearby and would know about the cameras" part...
People make mistakes all the time, professionals included, mostly because they believe they know, until they find out that there's something they didn't know, such as a new camera. Also, why would they rush to destroy the site regarding the investigation part?
Also this, from the same comment section
>I live down road from this, there isn’t much mystery, Elberton is the granite capital of the world, dynamite and blasting caps are all over, tannerite is a possibility, but unlikely, this monument has not set well with any local...
>My first impression is that the explosive compound was similar to Tannerite. Military-type explosives produce a black cloud of smoke, due to the inclusion of petroleum-based compounds. Ammonium nitrate-based explosives usually produce white smoke. Additionally, they are easy to purchase and safer to transport. Their explosive potential is high, as they are commonly used in mining operations. As for the video being clipped - I'm guessing the GBI is excluding some video for the moment as it has potential to provide investigative leads. At least they released something showing the actual event.
I agree with Bobby Ashley. Having first hand experience working with munitions in the army and working with EOD while in Afganistan. This is a shape charge type explosion. All the debris was projected in one direction and didn’t damage the other structures.
If Ashley is being honest and unbiased, I will value his expert opinion. I have little/no knowledge of him or his affiliations, so ... I have to see this as another theory for the moment ... which may be proven correct in the end. I have read others comments assuming it was a shaped charge and others with the directed energy theory. I agree, directed energy seems like overkill for this event. If blasting materials and expertise are readily available in that area, along with a general disdain of the monument ... why now, why wait so long?
>why now, why wait so long?
Boiling point maybe
Shit is getting really deep in GA. Stacy Abrhams et al are very bad news. If I lived there, I'd be boiling.
(post is archived)