Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

932

Ie one that could only involve its self in transportation related issues. Another in policing. Another agricultural. Another in arts and culture, parks etc. Another in border security. Another in military. Another for Navy, etc.

This way they’d all collect taxes on their own. You’d vote for people who were specialists. And you wouldn’t have to single issue vote on people anymore.

Ie Democrats who single issue vote on being a homosexual. Have a homosexual affairs gov branch.

Ie one that could only involve its self in transportation related issues. Another in policing. Another agricultural. Another in arts and culture, parks etc. Another in border security. Another in military. Another for Navy, etc. This way they’d all collect taxes on their own. You’d vote for people who were specialists. And you wouldn’t have to single issue vote on people anymore. Ie Democrats who single issue vote on being a homosexual. Have a homosexual affairs gov branch.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (7).
[–] • 1 pt

Ya I think voting for one person to be the ultimate head of all different types of issues regarding different fields of science doesn’t make any sense.

[–] • 1 pt

Sure it does, if you're buddies with that one guy, or have dirt on him.

Or if you don't hàve more data collected every hour than all of human history combined from before 100 years ago.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Rule by fiat. No president was allowed to do such at such a scale until Lincoln.