Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

598

Listening on the radio this morning for thirty minutes resulted in no less than three commercials for booster shots which were funded by Pfizer. Two of them were back to back.

All three mentioned the CDC recommending the shots.

None of them explicitly said that they are safe and effective.

I remember a commercial put on by the health department which said they are safe and effective but NONE BY PFIZER.

So, do any of you have one that was funded by Pfizer which explicitly states that they are safe AND effective?

Listening on the radio this morning for thirty minutes resulted in no less than three commercials for booster shots which were funded by Pfizer. Two of them were back to back. All three mentioned the CDC recommending the shots. None of them explicitly said that they are safe and effective. I remember a commercial put on by the health department which said they are safe and effective but NONE BY PFIZER. So, do any of you have one that was funded by Pfizer which explicitly states that they are safe AND effective?

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Of course not. It would open up a loophole in their liability protection. That's why they have the CDC and FDA to do it. It's their marketing department for clot shots and other deadly injections.

[–] • 1 pt

They are still on shaky legal ground, imo. They imply that they are talking about the FDA approved, version Cominarty. But only the EUA version is available. And they aren't allowed to advertise EUA drugs without specifically saying so.

[–] • 0 pt

Beware the medical-industrial complex.

[–] • 1 pt

"safe" and "effective" don't actually mean anything without a percentage. There might be some obscure rule that doesn't let them use such vague terms in their own commercials. Of course they don't need to, they can bribe or bully every celebrity, politician and fake news propagandist to say it for them. Soon the NPCs start parroting it and they don't even need to do that.