>>You really are a ignorant fuck aren't you? Projecting, much? Mister "I haz an opinion backed by myass!" That's actually more the scientists getting silenced speaking here You would know if you could read more than 2 paragraphs Top Line Results Radio frequency radiation: 91% (n=240) of 261 oxidative damage (or free radical) studies reported significant effects. 65% (n=226) of 348 genetic effects studies reported significant effects including: 65% (n=72) of 110 DNA comet assay studies reported significant effects. 73% (n=245) of 335 neurological studies reported significant effects. Overall, 75% (n=711) of 944 radio frequency radiation studies reported significant biologic effects. Extremely low frequency and static field electromagnetic fields: 89% (n=235) of 263 oxidative damage (or free radical) studies reported significant effects. 78% (n=160) of 204 genetic effects studies reported significant effects including: 73% (n=46) of 63 DNA comet assay studies reported significant effects. 91% (n=216) of 238 neurological studies reported significant effects. Overall, 87% (n=611) of 705 extremely low frequency and static electromagnetic field studies reported significant biologic effects. Overall, 80% (n=1,322) of 1,649 studies of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields reported significant effects. Links to abstracts: https://bioinitiative.org/research-summaries/