Why would I give a fuck about another country when my own country is getting so fucked up?
I don't understand why it is so important that your country is fucked up when it comes to helping out another country that's staunchly nationalist. It sounds like you'd like to spread the misery in your own country onto others, or think, that it's okay, if other countries are being overrun by the soviet army because kikes made you depressed, or something like that.
I really don't understand that mindset. I mean, yeah, the west is fucked up. But why would you be against it, or would not care, when it once in a while actually does the right thing?
In my opinion, the west should escalate this conflict as much as possible, so that it enters an existential fight against another power-block that actually has the means to wage such a conflict. I mean, you can pretty much say, that the russians are in large parts responsible for the refugee crisises in europe. Their game became pretty obvious last year, when the belorussians tried to flood poland with shitskins, after the russians have caused another refugee-flood to turkey, which then led them through to europe. I would say, that this smoldering conflict is worse than an actual war, especially because having traitors, subversives and outright enemies on the inside is nothing that a nation can afford during an existential conflict. And I think, that that's what we all want. Getting rid of subverts, traitors, and the enemy from within. Escalating this war is the best way to achieve that.
Escalating this war is the best way to achieve that.
Yes dood!
So you want to keep things calm and comfy, so that there's no need to root out the traitors that are responsible for the weakening of the west?
In my opinion, the west should escalate this conflict as much as possible
Ok.
I mean, seriously. The alternatives are, that a 98% white and now ultranationalistic country gets raped by the soviet army, which to 70%+ is made up of mutts or asians.
If the west escalates, this conflict will soon get existential, and this will create the hard times we all hope for.
The conflict already is existential for the russian leadership, because they'll end up death or in prison if they lose too badly. They now are in a situation where they must cling to power until death, because they'll be killed or imprisoned as soon as they lose their position. So russia from now on must be considered as a tyrannical dictatorship. With that in mind, an nuclear exchange is on the table, if russia loses too badly, so that their leadership becomes threatened militarily. They will certainly wage economic war against and activate their fifth column of shitskins, that by now is in every country, and has been invited by kikes and traitors. Those will create huge problems for the west, and will make it simply too expensive to tolerate the ongoing subversion. And when it becomes necessary to ignore muh human rights of traitors, the next step is to put them in camps and/or make traitors and subverts disappear, which ultimately is what we all should strive for.
And in this case, all the stars are aligned towards that end. The only ones that seemingly want to prevent that are rightwingers, that seemingly have been conditioned to become contrarians instead of performing independent thought.
Am I wrong?
(post is archived)