Even though he dictated to others, it is clear that his words were inspired by the Holy Spirit.
They could have also been inspired by the unholy spirit.
Half-truths have lead many men astray.
For example I heard it argued that the "holy spirit" was actually the bloodlines, going back to abel. And that therefore the "unforgiveable sin", or to "blasphemy the holyspirit" was to commit adultry.
Would explain why early on it says not to "lay with the beasts of the field."
Gonna have to write a schizopost about this.
> Even though he dictated to others, it is clear that his words were inspired by the Holy Spirit.
They could have also been inspired by the *unholy spirit*.
Half-truths have lead many men astray.
For example I heard it argued that the "holy spirit" was actually the bloodlines, going back to abel. And that therefore the "unforgiveable sin", or to "blasphemy the holyspirit" was to commit adultry.
Would explain why early on it says not to "lay with the beasts of the field."
Gonna have to write a schizopost about this.
(post is archived)