Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

Im looking at it now, it has more people than Poal does, but overall its like a rehashed twitter. They even have the (((verified))) profiles and everything. Outside the skin, it's just Twitter 2, but with more glow niggers and (((fellow))) white people

Im looking at it now, it has more people than Poal does, but overall its like a rehashed twitter. They even have the (((verified))) profiles and everything. Outside the skin, it's just Twitter 2, but with more glow niggers and (((fellow))) white people

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (31).
[–] • 13 pts (edited )

1) They don't censor except for violence and porn/pedophilia. 2) Built their own tech stack and hosting so it can't be shut down as easily 3) Haven't taken VC money (which is how the banking dynasties control private companies) 4) The CEO is legitimately based and has hardcore Christian convictions so he's unlikely to sell out (at least I think)

On the downside, the place is spammed to hell with partisan political bullshit and room temperature IQ stuff. It's a nonstop spam feed of Tucker Carlson videos and catturd.

They need better controls so users can filter out controlled opposition and littering.

[–] • 1 pt

They also need a "new" feed. And a "medium" / "low attention" feed. Kind of like rising on reddit etc.

[–] • 0 pt

The points up top dont really matter. If i wanted to see rehashed memes and content from facebook, Gab looks identical to the other tier services, with some minor conservative lean. However, all the content is is crappy memes and random pictures or reactionary headlines. The stack doesn't much mater if the content is crap

[–] • 1 pt

It's useful if you have specific people you want to follow/watch their videos that are censored on twitter. That's about it. The conversational stuff is horrible because there are too many mainstream "conservative" retards and bots.