All 'crimes' where there is no victim in court (or in a grave) shouldn't be crimes.
"The state vs." should always be nullified ... the state can't be a victim.
If selected for jury duty, I personally promise to vote not guilty (or use juror nullification) if the victim is 'the state'.
(All crimes -with a victim in the court or in the ground- should have heavy penalties.)
All 'crimes' where there is no victim in court (or in a grave) shouldn't be crimes.
"The state vs." should always be nullified ... the state can't be a victim.
If selected for jury duty, I personally promise to vote not guilty (or use juror nullification) if the victim is 'the state'.
(All crimes -with a victim in the court or in the ground- should have heavy penalties.)
What if it's a nigger on trial?
What if it's a nigger on trial?
Did he hurt someone? Then - yes.
Example:
- If any man wishes to smoke crack, that's on him. He can wreck his life, I don't care. But, I won't help put him in jail. No matter his skin color.
- If that same man murders his kid while on crack, then I'll be first in line to enforce capital punishment. No matter his skin color.
Did he hurt someone? Then - yes.
Example:
- If any man wishes to smoke crack, that's on him. He can wreck his life, I don't care. But, I won't help put him in jail. No matter his skin color.
- If that same man murders his kid while on crack, then I'll be first in line to enforce capital punishment. No matter his skin color.
cuck
cuck
(post is archived)