What about Fukushima and Chernobyl? I guess they happened to use a different form of nuclear process from eachother in which amazingly releases less radiation into the atmosphere? Maybe Japan is a super special place that can handle Nuclear radiation better then anywhere else on the planet?
Why do they claim that US nuclear testing sites are 61 x more deadlier then Chernobyl?
I guess I should shut up considering i'm not a nuclear physicist. Trust in the experts is how the mantra goes.
Those were not fission explosions. Those were radioactive material spills. Fission bombs are designed to convert almost all of their radioactive core. The disaster is the immediate massive death and destruction of infrastructure.
https://www.livescience.com/65949-marshall-islands-more-radioactivity-chernobyl.html
Some of the Marshall Islands in the Pacific Ocean — such as the Bikini and Enewetak atolls — are still more radioactive than Chernobyl and Fukushima, even though more than 60 years have passed since the United States tested radioactive weapons on those islands, a new study finds.
Many tests and not all the fissile material converted. Hense the testing. The Marshall Islands are more closely related to a dirty bomb than the effects of a thermonuclear explosion.
What about Fukushima and Chernobyl?
Those were nuclear power plants, not nuclear bombs.
I guess I should shut up considering i'm not a nuclear physicist.
You should just shut up because you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.
https://www.livescience.com/65949-marshall-islands-more-radioactivity-chernobyl.html
Some of the Marshall Islands in the Pacific Ocean — such as the Bikini and Enewetak atolls — are still more radioactive than Chernobyl and Fukushima, even though more than 60 years have passed since the United States tested radioactive weapons on those islands, a new study finds.
(post is archived)