Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

522

If stock markets did not exist, how would this affect the world?

If stock trading was shut down and made illegal what would the outcome be for the world & society?

If stock markets did not exist, how would this affect the world? If stock trading was shut down and made illegal what would the outcome be for the world & society?

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 8 pts

Jews would be unable to steal companies from the white founders.

[–] • 2 pts

J>>ews would be unable to steal companies from the white founders.

One thing that sticks with me is that dirty tricks like undervaluing a good well run business, by underselling stock shares in the business is still legal. Doesnt reflect the true value of an actual business and its outgoings.

[–] • 0 pt

that happened to me 4x lol. they are if anything very good at this. every time was unique. i protected from the previous versions. Now I'm so careful as fuck. But we need to be able to raise. We need stocks. Otherwise none one will be able to invest. Which means poverty will be the norm. Because only risk takers will make anything.

[–] • 5 pts (edited )

Companies don't have to go public and list themselves on the stock market, they choose to do this as an easy way to raise capital from investors, providing a financially healthy company capital to rapidly expand, and an unhealthy company a chance to recover.

Without the market it would be much more difficult for a chain restaurant to go nationwide seemingly overnight. That void might allow for more localized brands and small businesses, or (and in my opinion more likely) we would have a limited number of mega companies that have been around for generations with pockets large enough to gobble up any competition that starts to present itself. These companies would be unchallengeable without investments from the mega rich.

The market levels the playing field in that a new company with promising offerings can gather capital from millions of investors overnight to make a run at today's giants.

The unfortunate bit is how the market has been turned into a casino with the players having unfavorable odds, but that's a much larger conversation.

[–] • 2 pts

Without the market it would be much more difficult for a chain restaurant to go nationwide seemingly overnight

I don't think that is true at all. All the money that goes into the stock market from everyone's payckeck would still be there. People would still be looking to invest it. There would just be a different system to facilitate it.

[–] • 0 pt

Fair point, those with the ability to invest could work through a bank that would sell ownership in a company in a way similar to bonds (though this is a little close to stock and should probably be excluded).

If the market was large enough a centralized trading /tracking system would be needed to keep prices nationwide level - bringing us back to what we have today...

[–] • 0 pt

I agree that it seems all roads lead back to the same.

[–] • 1 pt

QT And chicken filA are private and crushing

[+] [deleted] • 2 pts
[–] • 1 pt

Everything would be more expensive, but slightly more fair.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

The problem isn't the stock market but the fact that company owners (shareholders) don't share in the liability of a company. This is entirely a creation of the government. Take that away and the world would be very different.

[–] • 0 pt

That is not true. Shareholders can lose everything if the stock thanks.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Lack of liability means you can't lose more than the value of your shares. You can't be liable for damages done by the company.

[–] • 1 pt

That exists outside of the stockmarket though. Corporations and LLCs are protected from liability.

[–] • 1 pt

The movement of money would be inhibited. The world economy would come to a screeching stop.

[–] • 1 pt

They would just take what they want by force. Taxes would go way up. Companies would be regulated to death, handed over, and then no more regulation....and will have direct money flow from the government/fed. Money laundering would be more obvious. Much more foreign aid would be going out to be laundered back to government "officials".

Basically just different corruption

[–] • 1 pt

Jews would have to work for a living....

"Work Shall set you Free"

[–] • 1 pt

Probably more honest labor. There would be less control over the companies.

By listing your company on the exchanges, you have pretty much sold it to the rothchilds. They own the federal reserve bank and can purchase any company. Giving them total control over all those companies.

[–] • 0 pt

It would need regulations. A lot of it. I'm not saying it's not a viable solution but it would need for the owners of every companies to own their business entirely and solely. Or you can share the value of the business with the workers of that business and they cannot sell their shares but only cash out a proportional reimbursement when they leave and get a share of the benefits. I like both possibilities.