Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

907

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

Remember that Clinton sold a bunch of uranium to Russia. When they do false flag a nuke, a nuke which uses the same uranium, US "experts" will claim that the radioactive signature is that of Russian uranium, and in a way it will be true!

[–] • 1 pt

Something something Mueller Russia tarmac black market uranium sample out of Novosibirsk caught in Georgia.

[–] • 2 pts

Everything they do is a lie, exaggeration, or a complete fabrication, or haven't you been paying attention?

[–] • 1 pt

I thought nukes were fake

[–] • 0 pt

Ergo the necessity to fake one.

Otherwise, they'd just use a real one.

[–] • 0 pt

I mean how? They'd have to use a real one. A small one Luke a brefcase bomb to give a radiation field and kill what, 8 or 9 thousand. It will work for their purposes. .

[–] • 3 pts

Same way they faked covid... saturation of fake information.

[–] • 1 pt

Yes. Just have some reporter stand in times square and say that New York was leveled by a russian nuke. Everyone will believe it, even people in New York. Years later they will tell their kids about how they survived and rebuilt the city... when in reality nothing at all happened. Just like Covid.

[–] • 0 pt

Ukrainian war footage is almost entirely fake.

[–] • 1 pt

A dirty bomb will suffice for the media to sell it as a "nuke".

[–] • 0 pt

Nobody's going to set off an atomic weapon. At least, not in the next little while.

[–] • 0 pt

You should fake a nuke

[–] • 0 pt

No, thanks.

We're on enough lists.

[–] • 1 pt

If you or I were to make a list it would probably be a felony