I have read the main stream media response to the film and so far they don’t really have a great argument. They claim that the data is not accurate enough to pin point people by the drop boxes which is kind of true but for this use case holds no value. Then they attack the fact that these data points show up at the non profits and drop boxes all over the area and the answer is it is just a coincidence. Then they take on the video evidence and use one man as an example that claims he dropped off his whole families votes and some guy in Georgia that agents supposedly investigated which only turned in his families votes also. They also claim the non profits did nothing wrong and collecting votes is totally legal and the right thing to do. Really they don’t present very good arguments but hope that they can put just enough out there that a normie can totally just put aside common sense and ignore the fact that their is a crime that law enforcement is not investigating. Really there is enough for law enforcement to do something but since they refuse to follow it further this will alway be something normies can use to think we are not as bad as a third world country pretending to vote in a dictatorship.
I agree.
(post is archived)