I think banning anything having to do with Pedo shit is fine and good and appropriate in line with the written TOS.
I'm more questioning your unilateral judgement on the issue.
I think banning anything having to do with Pedo shit is fine and good and appropriate in line with the written TOS.
I'm more questioning your unilateral judgement on the issue.
I'm more questioning your unilateral judgement on the issue.
What's your solution then? Because we've talked about this and there's no way to prove someone violated the ToS (pedophilia or zoophilia) without showing the violating content. And as we concluded, they would intentionally post such offending content knowing it would be relayed in the reports.
> I'm more questioning your unilateral judgement on the issue.
What's your solution then? Because we've talked about this and there's no way to prove someone violated the ToS (pedophilia or zoophilia) without showing the violating content. And as we concluded, they would intentionally post such offending content knowing it would be relayed in the reports.
(post is archived)