But what about when you specifically decide it?
I'm running the place, so it is my sole responsibility.
Obviously, I'm not asking to blindly trust me, but if someone doubts or don't trust me, nothing forces them to stay.
Would that be sexualizing a minor?
I don't understand why you ask such a question when the ToS is clear about it:
Sexually oriented discussions (including memes, jokes, sarcasm, sexual innuendoes, stories...) involving children is strictly prohibited.
Aka normalization of pedophilia through proxy humor.
I think banning anything having to do with Pedo shit is fine and good and appropriate in line with the written TOS.
I'm more questioning your unilateral judgement on the issue.
I'm more questioning your unilateral judgement on the issue.
What's your solution then? Because we've talked about this and there's no way to prove someone violated the ToS (pedophilia or zoophilia) without showing the violating content. And as we concluded, they would intentionally post such offending content knowing it would be relayed in the reports.
You restricted my account after I posted an archive link of an iFunny page about black on white crime, pointing out that even iFunny users are red pilled.
You have no credibility.
lol The kike will always tell you how persecuted he is, but he’ll never tell you why.
I think it's a leap to think that dark humor 'normalizes' anything. Like violent video games normalize violence...... it's just not true.
We’re talking about pedophilia here, not video games.
(post is archived)