But making the reporter's names public could be used to target them specifically.
I meant the voluntary confirmation by those other users that they saw the content in question. Not you sharing the report logs.
What about offenders found by the admin account? Just like the last two accounts banned for pedophilia (joke and apology).
Dunno. At some point you have to trust. If you post what they say as an announcement or whatever when you ban them, they'll just do it to force you to keep their evil content stickied, even if it's for a few minutes.
But what about when you specifically decide it?
Like if you specifically decided to say a certain user was banned, because they were sexualizing kids?
I've brought this up before, and I know there is no perfect response, but what if you just banned a user for saying something that you viewed as sexualizing, but wasn't in most people's view?
This is obviously going to be a terrible example, because I am making it up off the top of my head, but what if a there was a video of a girl punching a donkey, and the title was "Pounded that Ass"?
Would that be sexualizing a minor?
But what about when you specifically decide it?
I'm running the place, so it is my sole responsibility.
Obviously, I'm not asking to blindly trust me, but if someone doubts or don't trust me, nothing forces them to stay.
Would that be sexualizing a minor?
I don't understand why you ask such a question when the ToS is clear about it:
Sexually oriented discussions (including memes, jokes, sarcasm, sexual innuendoes, stories...) involving children is strictly prohibited.
Aka normalization of pedophilia through proxy humor.
I think banning anything having to do with Pedo shit is fine and good and appropriate in line with the written TOS.
I'm more questioning your unilateral judgement on the issue.
You restricted my account after I posted an archive link of an iFunny page about black on white crime, pointing out that even iFunny users are red pilled.
You have no credibility.
I think it's a leap to think that dark humor 'normalizes' anything. Like violent video games normalize violence...... it's just not true.
I'm 120% down with making reporters names public
Well, I don't think all of the reporters would want that, and it would reduce the amount of reports, making it harder to spot the offenders.
That's sort of why I've tried to make a post calling them out directly the couple of times I've seen it. So others can see it and hopefully remember it when they're banned. The jokes and apology, that is, obviously not for actual images.
Well, this is a niggling problem that will have to be noggled.
(post is archived)