Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

835

(I deleted the first post because user-error)

As the title says, is the end result for all this grooming stuff the social acceptance or codification that children can have "consent"?

I mean, what could there be to teaching a small child about sexual degeneracy other than to get them to a point where they "understand" what it is enough to be able to "consent" to it?

I hate this timeline. I seriously cannot believe this is where we have fallen as a society.

(I deleted the first post because user-error) As the title says, is the end result for all this grooming stuff the social acceptance or codification that children can have "consent"? I mean, what could there be to teaching a small child about sexual degeneracy other than to get them to a point where they "understand" what it is enough to be able to "consent" to it? I hate this timeline. I seriously cannot believe this is where we have fallen as a society.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (17).
[–] • 0 pt

Children can't consent, it's why they are children.

Thats my whole point. They're moving, or attempting to move the goalposts to where children can "understand" what they're "consenting" to enough to provide their level of accepted consent.

Its a fucking degenerate game and they all deserve the rope.