One sign of CD is when people refuse to look at information. All information, even shit from the MSM, has a probability of being correct.
With the MSM there are 4 problems, first is that many of their "works" contain no information at all, second is that some works are un-cited, third is that cited ones are often not correct (removal of context, interpretation of what was said, etc.), and forth that the people they choose to cite are often full of shit.
So when you see people here ignoring information get back to me; I haven't seen it yet.
One sign of CD is when people refuse to look at information. All information, even shit from the MSM, has a probability of being correct.
With the MSM there are 4 problems, first is that many of their "works" contain no information at all, second is that some works are un-cited, third is that cited ones are often not correct (removal of context, interpretation of what was said, etc.), and forth that the people they choose to cite are often full of shit.
So when you see people here ignoring information get back to me; I haven't seen it yet.
(post is archived)