> The want for suggested perfection represents the lack of comprehension about the perfect origin, to which one needs to adapt aka as the chaotic form to the order of flow aka as choice to balance. Do you mean to imply here that the perfect origin is 'flow' ? Can you be more specific ? Humans being form within flow, yet the flow is within us (blood) so maybe you might suggest our origin is blood. Then again, evidently we are originally a sperm (flow) and an egg (form)... and if the origin is an egg then the original origin is flow, no ? Chicken or egg? But we could go a level father up, cause water is abundant everywhere - is our origin just 'water' ? Did water up and decide to begin creating forms out of its own flow ? Though perhaps this is thinking too linearly and in the wrong direction; evolution seems a masonic inversion so more likely the better perspective to take is to analyze top down - if 'we' created everything we would use our hands & brainpower to build the complex yet balanced (hopefully enough that it can survive a parasitical infection) known as Earth. We would engineer animals and plants just as we would 'today' without the need for them to come about randomly over the course of billions of years. If we look at the world as a creation of our own - something human-made - then I find it to be a more tangible 'origin' vs trying to figure out how water decided to become form. The question then is always, if humans created this what created humans?