Is civil war going to happen next? | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (36).

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

Is civil war going to happen next? It's the only thing I can imagine.

The u.s. does not want civil war. Look at the projection in the ukraine conflict. "Russia, don't fight! Thats what THEY want you to do!"

Same playbook on every narrative front the u.s. engages in.

If it were true, the u.s. would have followed through against russia. But we didn't, and now, even if were did, it would be seen for what it is: to sow doubt among intel about these very conclusions.

By looking at this as a bellweather, we can say that the same is true about the civil war narrative.

They want to

spread the rumor the u.s. is covertly pushing for civil war in america
keep americans sitting on their hands and in fear
convince us if it DID come to that, that the u.s. would win, or at least, that it would be hugely costly to all of us on a collective level, and the outcome uncertain
Thereby suppressing the risk that the u.s. does turn to a civil war.

How do I know number four is true, and the real goal? Because the other three conclusions support it.

Of course theres contingencies in place in case they lose control anyway--in case things, despite the fifth branch (spy agencies), start going sideways domestically. Thats the nascent Q movement which they could arm and organize (lot of the "military vets" leading it are spook contractors), the whisper campaign by "social influencers" in the alternative-news sphere (more spooks claiming to be military vets). My claim to fame, was constructing a plausible cover about how I was "told" by someone close to one spook (guy who runs revolutionradio), what his real name was, and that his first name was "Chris"--which was actually just a pure guess. Dude vanished, like next fucking day, and stayed gone off the net for like six months, lol, until I made a public post explaining how I actually got his name (again, a guess).

Thats also what I mean when I say, if we can't be organized against the regime's plans or actions, then we can use anticipation to intercept those plans. Forces them into reacting, on the backfoot. Typically this wouldn't work because solid IO groups will have policies to prevent reactions that expose them, but the state has grown so fast, and is moving so quickly now, that its actors and jackboots aren't competent and have to play it fast and loose, which is the chink in the armor we need to even begin to win.

And now that they have fallen for the acceleration meme, pushed from all of us on the bottom, they are in a death spiral where they can't slow down, so they can't undo this flaw in their organizing, because their plans require a lot of low-level guys to push through with any meaningful success rate. The achilles heel is built-in.

Basically they got overconfident, because they were encouraged to believe the necessary segment of the population had the same goals even if ideologically opposed to them. So the internationalists took the bait and accelerated, and now they're on the hook and can't get off the hook because the hook is set.

Civil war will happen, and the controlled-burn (compromised military vets and spooks leading "the resistance") will fail because their methods are known and the playbook against them basically writes itself. This was the whole point of helping the regime magnify the civil war narrative too early. So people would have time to see the grift and understand the dynamics. Might not look like it now, but in a bad situation, when people are forced to pull together to survive, these old back-of-the-brain lessons are gonna come-to-the-fore and the contractor networks the CIA runs will fail to maintain control over activated military and civilian paramilitary groups. The spies will be outed fast, because the units that don't won't survive the airforce being turned on the civilian population.

> Is civil war going to happen next? It's the only thing I can imagine. The u.s. does not want civil war. Look at the projection in the ukraine conflict. "Russia, don't fight! Thats what THEY want you to do!" Same playbook on every narrative front the u.s. engages in. If it were true, the u.s. would have followed through against russia. But we didn't, and now, even if were *did*, it would be seen for what it is: to sow doubt among intel about these very conclusions. By looking at this as a bellweather, we can say that the same is true about the civil war narrative. They want to 1. spread the rumor the u.s. is covertly pushing for civil war in america 2. keep americans sitting on their hands and in fear 3. convince us if it DID come to that, that the u.s. would win, or at least, that it would be hugely costly to all of us on a collective level, and the outcome uncertain 4. Thereby suppressing the risk that the u.s. *does* turn to a civil war. How do I know number four is true, and the real goal? Because the other three conclusions support it. Of course theres contingencies in place in case they lose control anyway--in case things, despite the fifth branch (spy agencies), start going sideways domestically. Thats the nascent Q movement which they could arm and organize (lot of the "military vets" leading it are spook contractors), the whisper campaign by "social influencers" in the alternative-news sphere (more spooks claiming to be military vets). My claim to fame, was constructing a plausible cover about how I was "told" by someone close to one spook (guy who runs revolutionradio), what his real name was, and that his first name was "Chris"--which was actually just a pure guess. Dude vanished, like next fucking day, and stayed gone off the net for like six months, lol, until I made a public post explaining how I actually got his name (again, a guess). Thats also what I mean when I say, if we can't be organized against the regime's plans or actions, then we can use *anticipation* to *intercept* those plans. Forces them into reacting, on the backfoot. Typically this wouldn't work because solid IO groups will have policies to prevent reactions that expose them, but the state has grown so fast, and is moving so quickly now, that its actors and jackboots aren't competent and have to play it fast and loose, which is the chink in the armor we need to even begin to win. And now that they have fallen for the *acceleration* meme, pushed from all of us on the bottom, they are in a death spiral where they *can't* slow down, so they can't undo this flaw in their organizing, because their plans require a *lot* of low-level guys to push through *with any meaningful success rate*. The achilles heel is built-in. Basically they got overconfident, because they were encouraged to believe the necessary segment of the population had the same goals even if ideologically opposed to them. So the internationalists took the bait and accelerated, and now they're on the hook and can't get off the hook because the hook is set. Civil war *will* happen, and the controlled-burn (compromised military vets and spooks leading "the resistance") will fail because their methods are known and the playbook against them basically writes itself. This was the *whole* point of *helping* the regime magnify the civil war narrative *too early*. So people would have time to see the grift and understand the dynamics. Might not look like it now, but in a bad situation, when people are forced to pull together to survive, these old back-of-the-brain lessons are gonna come-to-the-fore and the contractor networks the CIA runs will fail to maintain control over activated military and civilian paramilitary groups. The spies will be outed fast, because the units that don't won't survive the airforce being turned on the civilian population.

link