Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K
• (edited )
voatfaga non grata Why are you all too scared to downvote?

Cause the mod banned it once during some raid? if ur scared of the mods that makes u a cuck. jew-owned sites banned downvoting too because people were too fragile to handle it. do u guys also need a jew to protect u from scary downvotes?

i'm sick of being the only one downvoting lakotapride's purposeful 'it's da nazis!!!' disinfo rhetoric threads. they shouldn't be on the front page. the downvote button is there for a reason. stop letting qtards dominate with their disinfo and fight back faggots.

edit: no surprise that aou has now blocked my ability to up or downvote and greyed me out. he will do anything to protect the qtards and ensure they stay at the top whilst censoring and tagging all the actual aware high iq people. he's a total con artist (and an autist with a reddit-like persona.. that type of weirdo mental illness usual = pedo).

he always does this if anyone speaks out, which is why he has nothing but pathetic dick suckers who agree with him and upvote him no matter what. it's the same dynamic no matter where you go, even on 'free speech' sites like this. humans are pathetic, love to form little groups and then oust anybody who doesn't conform and attack them with mob mentality.

Cause the mod banned it once during some raid? if ur scared of the mods that makes u a cuck. jew-owned sites banned downvoting too because people were too fragile to handle it. do u guys also need a jew to protect u from scary downvotes? i'm sick of being the only one downvoting lakotapride's purposeful 'it's da nazis!!!' disinfo rhetoric threads. they shouldn't be on the front page. the downvote button is there for a reason. stop letting qtards dominate with their disinfo and fight back faggots. edit: no surprise that aou has now blocked my ability to up or downvote and greyed me out. he will do anything to protect the qtards and ensure they stay at the top whilst censoring and tagging all the actual aware high iq people. he's a total con artist (and an autist with a reddit-like persona.. that type of weirdo mental illness usual = pedo). he always does this if anyone speaks out, which is why he has nothing but pathetic dick suckers who agree with him and upvote him no matter what. it's the same dynamic no matter where you go, even on 'free speech' sites like this. humans are pathetic, love to form little groups and then oust anybody who doesn't conform and attack them with mob mentality.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (80).
[–] • 1 pt

The idea that a down vote function as used at Poal protects feelings and is censorship is nigger tiered stupidity.

The traditional down vote was used to censor and you can reply as hurtful as you want. Where's the protected feelings?

[–] • 1 pt

A like, upvote whatever you want to call it means “I like or agree with this post. It’s a good post, more like this”

A dislike or downvote means “I don’t like or agree with this post. It sucks. Get fucked.”

By essentially only having an upvote button it literally protects people from a negative reaction or criticism. I know I know, “use the comments to express those opinions” but the problem is a LOT of the time I don’t feel like typing “you’re a retard and your post is bad for xyz reasons” when there is a fucking arrow system right there that expresses both negative and positive feelings really well.

[–] • 1 pt

A like, upvote whatever you want to call it means “I like or agree with this post. It’s a good post, more like this”

A dislike or downvote means “I don’t like or agree with this post. It sucks. Get fucked.”

Wrong and wrong.

By essentially only having an upvote button it literally protects people from a negative reaction or criticism.

Totally wrong.

but the problem is a LOT of the time I don’t feel like typing ...

Yes. The problem is you're a lazy fuck. I agree. And just as you suggested a downvote as you describe would serve to protect your feelings by giving you a short cut to be the lazy fuck that you are.

I don't have to like or agree with a post to think it's a good post and upvote it. Upvote good info, good finds, and effort posts. Downvote spam and shit that violates the ToS.

If you don't like a post, but not enough to motivate you to give it a negative comment, skip over it and move on. If you think the post is stupid enough to warrant a negative comment, give a negative comment. You don't get to decide to downvote shit to discourage other users from posting their bullshit.

Not compensating for you being a lazy fuck isn't protecting anyone.

[–] • 1 pt

...And it never did, it was just a way to quickly censor wrong think and keep the hive in line.

If someone disagrees they gotta give a good argument and can't be a lazy nigger over it. No good argument, then they stfu...

[–] • 0 pt

What is the point of the up arrow?

[–] • 0 pt

So one can be a "lazy fuck" with the upvote button, but not with the downvote button where you have to do a negative comment? Upvotes need no explanations but the opposite does? BULLFUCKINSHIT! Downvotes only "discourage other users" that give a shit about points....but...but mah popularity....mah fee-fees! Some idiots need to grow the hell up! And why the fuck would spam and posts that violate the TOS even need to be downvoted, and not just removed? The mod and admin can't nuke that shit on their own?