Title: Even worse is...
Content: ...using a cliffhanger title. Because the nigger posting can't even summarize his thought in a dozen words.
Title: Even worse is...
Content: ...using a cliffhanger title. Because the nigger posting can't even summarize his thought in a dozen words.
There's a couple retards who keep doing it even though that have been nicely explained how posting works.
Moon, finger, fish, fisherman, I guess.
I'm too retarded to work out why trying to add an illustrative photo in a link post, just creates something that ignores the URL and just clicks through to that photo???
Every time I try this I end up deleting the post, and reposting without a photo.
Kinda gave up posting because it got annoying
Because there’s only one title (with an hypertext url). Extra images should be added as links in the post content.
Some subs are textpost or linkpost (images or not) only.
oh, OK ta
thought I could pretty it up a bit
I never understood that, idiots do it everywhere.
They also put the entire fucking tweet/headline/post in the title and then upload a pic of the tweet/headline/post of what you just fucking read, news sites do that in their articles too.
Why the fuck would I need the picture if you just typed what it said, conversely why would you need to type out what it says if you going to post a pic anyway.
That's as stupid as typing the word 'quote' right before you put the actual quote surrounded by quotemarks. The quotemarks specify it is a quote, saying it's a quote beforehand is redundant.
Almost as bad as that guy who has indeed as the title of every single post.
So often I'm searching for a recent image to share but can't find it because of retarded titles.
(post is archived)