WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

435

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

As water freezes , the molecules line up in an array, which can be observed under a microscope, and are found to be geometrical -- not amorphous.

You didn't read my words correctly and you certainly didn't watch the video because it explains why and how the geometric formations happen in ice and how it isn't always going to happen that way. Try learning something instead of calling me a jew because I didn't support your incorrect "science".

Your problem with me showing you something that has factual basis is that you don't like facts. You only like (((facts))). Your rat is showing.

[–] 0 pt

Thats literally what I said, isn't it? In your video, methods are explored to create different shapes under a microscope, and you stake a problem with any other cause citing "facts" and "science" like an inconsistent rat.

[–] 0 pt

The different shapes are controlled by temperature, humidity and distance apart for the snowflakes. There is no mention of microwaves or other EMF radiation affecting the shape and formation. Only kikes would bring in other non-related factors to a discussion that has foundation to it.

Also, per your previous statement about water having a geometric pattern to it instead of being an amorphous liquid- you basically said water is a solid. Only a solid can hold a steadfast geometric structure to it. Are you going to suggest that gases can also hold a geometric structure next? Learn some basic physics.

[–] 0 pt

The rat keeps on being a rat