WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

530

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Don't promote this bullshit pseudoscience. Water does not have a geometric structure. It is an amorphous liquid at normal temperatures and pressures and the water molecules align themselves to prefer hydrogen bonds but it does not yield a regular geometric pattern in doing so. Ice can, but that structure depends on many variables that have nothing to do with microwaves, 5G or any other technological radiation sources. Someone else posted some of this bullshit recently about 5G affecting the formation of ice crystals. It had a shitty video that was extremely light on facts and truth. We know a lot about how water behaves and how it has many forms of ice that do not follow the same behaviors at different temperatures and pressures.

If you really want to know more about how water freezes, in particular snowflakes exhibiting the hexagonal geometric pattern, then watch this video from the premier expert on snowflakes and how snowflakes form. You will be surprised to discover that water can freeze in many different ways under different conditions. This will help you understand that other variables have tremendous effects on the formation of structures that don't involve EMF radiation.

The Snowflake Mystery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao2Jfm35XeE

[–] 1 pt

The video in question was pointed out to be a saline vs. pure water demo.

[–] 1 pt

You sound like a certain rat creature shrieking out in pain

As water freezes , the molecules line up in an array, which can be observed under a microscope, and are found to be geometrical -- not amorphous. As, I'm sure if I watched your rat link, you are already well aware.

Your problem is not with my suggestion that it has geometric structure. Instead, your problem is that you believe it is other different conditions are what causes it.

[–] 0 pt

As water freezes , the molecules line up in an array, which can be observed under a microscope, and are found to be geometrical -- not amorphous.

You didn't read my words correctly and you certainly didn't watch the video because it explains why and how the geometric formations happen in ice and how it isn't always going to happen that way. Try learning something instead of calling me a jew because I didn't support your incorrect "science".

Your problem with me showing you something that has factual basis is that you don't like facts. You only like (((facts))). Your rat is showing.

[–] 0 pt

Thats literally what I said, isn't it? In your video, methods are explored to create different shapes under a microscope, and you stake a problem with any other cause citing "facts" and "science" like an inconsistent rat.

[–] 1 pt

AND ANOTHER THING..

As your jewish genius said, the one that made up gravity, if you can't explain it simply enough you don't understand it well enough (or something like that).

You gots to break things down better and stop trying to overlord with mumbo jumbo that the average faggot cannot understand.

Now TAKE this advice okay?