WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.5K

I tried but no luck

I tried /s/legal but no luck

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Well, stick around and when you get to level 10 you can make your own subs.

[–] 1 pt

You been breaking the law?

[–] 2 pts

You been breaking the law?

Don't we all. Practically everything is illegal now a days.

I'm interested in Dave Myrland's section 83 filings among many other things.

Title 18 section 242 protections might be useful as well.

Just looking for other people smarter than me in those regards.

[–] 0 pt

why do you want his information?

[–] 1 pt

why do you want his information?

Who is his? If you are referring to Dave, I have a lot of his information and paperwork. I just dont know if it really works. It reads as logical to me.

There are protections written all over in law and supreme court interpretations of law, but how to make them operate properly for one is another story altogether.

[–] 1 pt

do lawfags bind their victim before the rape or is it consensual?

[–] 1 pt

I believe, Good lawfags bitch slap corrupted officials through their bonding agent all the way to the bank, or turn up dead in the desert.

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

[–] 0 pt

Thanks for your response. I have read the code before.

A question I'm perusing is how often is this effectively prosecuted in the courts?

It would seem in a fair and just system, enforcement of almost all session laws would be punishable under 242.

That would mean all victimless crimes.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

> What exactly do you mean by a victimless crime? That very law has listed stipulation per that 242 list. Also https://www.lawinfo.com/resources/criminal-defense/what-are-some-examples-of-victimless-crimes.html

[–] 0 pt

What exactly do you mean by a victimless crime? That very law has listed stipulation per that 242 list.

Any "crime" where there is no claimant or injured party. Ex: jay walking, speeding, no registration, no license plate.

Imo forced auto registration would be making a victim (under duress) out of the automobile owner.

Unfortunitaly I have more questions than answers. I've read a lot but do not have much actual practice in using this information. I have been in the supreme court library and believe many things to be true, but a little misplaced knowledge can get one in a lot of trouble.

It would be nice to find more like minded and empassioned people to help share experiences and ideas.