What belief do you hold that is most at odds with the general Poal consensus?

[–] • 16 pts

Trump and DeSantis are owned by Jews. US should ally with Russia to defeat Islam and china. World leaders serve the antichrist.

link

[–] • 9 pts

Pretty sure most people except the Qtards would agree.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts

US is the Antichrist, or at least a manifestation of its energy in the form of a country. You aren't the Good Guys. That's the Hollywood programming that's hoodwinked you. Islam is just another flavor of the Antichrist.

parent
link

[–] • 8 pts

I don't think most people here think that the US ZOG is good. That'd be a position of normie Republicans.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

I don’t think any of the governments are the good guys at this point.

parent
link

[–] • 6 pts

That is exactly the poal consensus.

parent
link

[–] • 5 pts

Of course Trump and DeSantis are owned by Jews. Who here is saying otherwise?

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

Russia is also a member of the World Economic Forum.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Been telling friends since the '80s that we should have been helping the Soviets bomb the shit out of those fucking bomb chuckers instead of giving them American weapons systems.

parent
link

Load more (2 replies)

[–] • 12 pts

Hitler was a very good politician , and a terrible military commander.

link

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

Hitler as a military commander? I rate him 3.6/roentgens: not great, not terribel.

No Manstein plan without Hitler's intervention for example.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

I'd like to see you take a time machine back to a time before the internet existed, and lead a country that is being attacked by international Jews with unfounded propaganda because Jews ran the media machines in every western nation. I'd dare like to see what you would do if you were in Hitler's position at that time. I honestly can't think of a winning stratergy the Germans could have employed considering the kikes already had full control over America and the rest of Europe at that time.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

A good politician is one who works for the well-being of the people. Hillary never did that.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

I think you misread "Hitler" as "Hillary" unless you're going for some deeper meaning

parent
link

[–] • 11 pts

(edited )

Christianity has never been, nor will ever be the 'strength of a nation'... It is the European tradition that carried the weight that Christendom has demanded credit for. Christianity is THE OG multinational corporation. They were THE power base behind the modern suicidal "conservative" support for mass-migrant imports... The Stateless multinational Catholic Church is the prototype for the blended diplomatic and espionage corps employed by modern first world nations; this model is explicitly designed to WEAKEN the sovereignty of a nation, not enhance it. The Church, no matter the denomination, is loyal to no nation, no race, and no political ideology but it's own. Christianity is a personal choice, and one that should be defended, but Christianity is an invasive imposition of the Roman Empire, which itself was forcefully converted and arguably, destroyed thereby, by edict of the Caesar Constantine. The Church, using the full power of the Legions stationed throughout Europe, was established, funded, and defended by martial force against a population that had long been pacified by violent occupation, thus offered no unified resistance and were slaughtered; first by the Roman soldier, later by the converted warlord power bases loyal to the Church who conducted a campaign of suppression lasting roughly 500 years.

The pagan, druid, and heathen were polytheistic cultures which accepted the Christian, who mercilessly attacked them - must like the modern Muslim expansion... The relativist ALWAYS loses to the Absolutist in civil conflict - the perceived righteousness of the absolutists claims are irrelevant to the consideration. To say nothing of the fact that the Jesus story is a 1:1 transcription of the Egyptian Horus myth and an exported subsidiary of the Jewish slave religion which itself took hold after the Jew exodus from Egypt.

In the end, and no matter how violently a Christian instinctively rejects what I've written, there can be no argument against the truth that one's adherence to Christendom - thus their understanding of god - and one's loyalty to a nation state of men, produces a conflict of loyalty wherein the honest Christian must always side first with god, and only then with the nation they inhabit. The perception of persecution of Christianity by a State will always result in a condition where the Christian takes an ideological position against the state. One's god is always exalted above one's race, one's national identity, and one's service in their defense.

https://atheistmilitantsrising.home.blog/tag/forced-conversions-by-christians-of-pagans/

Christianity has never been, nor will ever be the 'strength of a nation'... It is the European tradition that carried the weight that Christendom has demanded credit for. Christianity is THE OG multinational corporation. They were THE power base behind the modern suicidal "conservative" support for mass-migrant imports... The Stateless multinational Catholic Church is the prototype for the blended diplomatic and espionage corps employed by modern first world nations; this model is explicitly designed to WEAKEN the sovereignty of a nation, not enhance it. The Church, no matter the denomination, is loyal to no nation, no race, and no political ideology but it's own. Christianity is a personal choice, and one that should be defended, but Christianity is an invasive imposition of the Roman Empire, which itself was forcefully converted and arguably, destroyed thereby, by edict of the Caesar Constantine. The Church, using the full power of the Legions stationed throughout Europe, was established, funded, and defended by martial force against a population that had long been pacified by violent occupation, thus offered no unified resistance and were slaughtered; first by the Roman soldier, later by the converted warlord power bases loyal to the Church who conducted a campaign of suppression lasting roughly 500 years. The pagan, druid, and heathen were polytheistic cultures which accepted the Christian, who mercilessly attacked them - must like the modern Muslim expansion... The relativist ALWAYS loses to the Absolutist in civil conflict - the perceived righteousness of the absolutists claims are irrelevant to the consideration. To say nothing of the fact that the Jesus story is a 1:1 transcription of the Egyptian Horus myth and an exported subsidiary of the Jewish slave religion which itself took hold after the Jew exodus from Egypt. In the end, and no matter how violently a Christian instinctively rejects what I've written, there can be no argument against the truth that one's adherence to Christendom - thus their understanding of god - and one's loyalty to a nation state of men, produces a conflict of loyalty wherein the honest Christian must always side first with god, and only then with the nation they inhabit. The perception of persecution of Christianity by a State will always result in a condition where the Christian takes an ideological position against the state. One's god is always exalted above one's race, one's national identity, and one's service in their defense. https://atheistmilitantsrising.home.blog/tag/forced-conversions-by-christians-of-pagans/

link

[–] • 3 pts

I got into a heated argument with my father last night after BBQ and beers. He essentially said I was retarded for believing kikes are not our friends. I can't remember the last time he was that angry. Pure, mainlined, ...shitty, boomer programming. Even asked "You call yourself Christian!?" I sat in silence. Because I don't.

I really do not enjoy. It's my dad. But fucking hell man.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

100% truth

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Good post. At least a few poalers agree with you though, I am one of them.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Horus

LOL. You don't know much about Jesus. He actually lived, died, and was resurrected. Maybe check out Cold Case Christianity?

Anyways, you're mostly in the majority with your hostility toward the Christ and/or people who have used his name.

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

Why the false dichotomy? Not believing in something is not being "against" something. Do you believe I can run a mile in 2 minutes? Does it make you anti-running if you don't believe it?

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

(edited )

Such victim-centric bullshit.

EVERYONE in the United States knows all about Jesus, which isn't even the fucker's name. You'd think using a deities proper name would matter somewhat, just like I'm positive there were a bunch of Peter's, Paul's, Luke's, Mary's, John's, etc all running around the fertile Crescent 2000 years ago.

Regardless.

The fact is, 'muh majority hostility' is analogous to nigger speak for systemic racism. The fact is 'the majority' of the first world, for 1500 years was forced, like literally forced, to be Christian. I don't give a single fuck about the self pity those religious assholes bemoan at every opportunity because it's CHRISTIANS that everyone hates, not your Christ. Christians are a bunch of bitchy little girls. As for the rest? There is fuck-all evidence supporting the bible myth. Sure, there are traces of regional floods, there are tombs that may or may not have been rumored to have been known to the sister of a cousin of an apostle. There are thousands of fanfic scribblings written throughout the dark ages and onward, and there are scraps that the seriously devout can point to as 'evidence' only because their minds are made regardless of the data. But primarily, there is the multinational Catholic government that amassed untold wealth and power, directly peddling it's wares to the aristocracy which in turn used them to passify and control a population by means of threats of damnation and salvation... It's the political power of the Church that is the reason the Western World has fixated on that mythos over time and as that power has waned - and the responsibility has fallen to the actual churches and adherents - the world has found itself unimpressed.

But, by all means, worship your god; I sincerely support that and I would wager most would agree. But pretending that there is incontrovertible evidence that he "actually lived, died, and was resurrected" is the theological equivalent of legally mandated trans acceptance. I don't care that you believe it. I don't care that you really really want it to be real... When it's forced on everyone else and we're all made to play pretend your fantasy is ours as well... Well, that's when shit gets old.

Fuck off with that self-pitying faggotry. Western society was Christianity's to lose... It had absolute dominion but it's bullshit dogma doesn't play as well when it's not backed by threat of violence. Christians don't play well with others, neither do the other Abrahamic religions, and they never have. Fuck, look to the American Republican party post advent of the NeoCon... Suddenly limited government, fiscal conservatism, States Rights, positions on taxation, interstate commerce, national resources, and the Constitution became nothing but trifling talking points took a hard backseat to the actual platform priorities of abortion, Jesus, and fags. The unofficial slogan of the Republicans became "If you're not Christian, get the fuck out..." And so everyone did and the leftist gained more and more power in the vacuum created in their absence. Even the false god emperor, in the end, was shown to be nothing more than a zionist puppet...

My gods and my tribe and my land are intertwined. There is no conflict between them, there will never be a position that divides them. They are one, and that is something no Christian can ever honestly claim.

Such victim-centric bullshit. EVERYONE in the United States knows all about Jesus, which isn't even the fucker's name. You'd think using a deities proper name would matter somewhat, just like I'm positive there were a bunch of Peter's, Paul's, Luke's, Mary's, John's, etc all running around the fertile Crescent 2000 years ago. Regardless. The fact is, 'muh majority hostility' is analogous to nigger speak for systemic racism. The fact is 'the majority' of the first world, for 1500 years was forced, like literally forced, to be Christian. I don't give a single fuck about the self pity those religious assholes bemoan at every opportunity because it's CHRISTIANS that everyone hates, not your Christ. Christians are a bunch of bitchy little girls. As for the rest? There is fuck-all evidence supporting the bible myth. Sure, there are traces of regional floods, there are tombs that may or may not have been rumored to have been known to the sister of a cousin of an apostle. There are thousands of fanfic scribblings written throughout the dark ages and onward, and there are scraps that the seriously devout can point to as 'evidence' only because their minds are made regardless of the data. But primarily, there is the multinational Catholic government that amassed untold wealth and power, directly peddling it's wares to the aristocracy which in turn used them to passify and control a population by means of threats of damnation and salvation... It's the political power of the Church that is the reason the Western World has fixated on that mythos over time and as that power has waned - and the responsibility has fallen to the actual churches and adherents - the world has found itself unimpressed. But, by all means, worship your god; I sincerely support that and I would wager most would agree. But pretending that there is incontrovertible evidence that he "actually lived, died, and was resurrected" is the theological equivalent of legally mandated trans acceptance. I don't care that you believe it. I don't care that you really really want it to be real... When it's forced on everyone else and we're all made to play pretend your fantasy is ours as well... Well, that's when shit gets old. Fuck off with that self-pitying faggotry. Western society was Christianity's to lose... It had absolute dominion but it's bullshit dogma doesn't play as well when it's not backed by threat of violence. Christians don't play well with others, neither do the other Abrahamic religions, and they never have. Fuck, look to the American Republican party post advent of the NeoCon... Suddenly limited government, fiscal conservatism, States Rights, positions on taxation, interstate commerce, national resources, and the Constitution became nothing but trifling talking points took a hard backseat to the actual platform priorities of abortion, Jesus, and fags. The unofficial slogan of the Republicans became "If you're not Christian, get the fuck out..." And so everyone did and the leftist gained more and more power in the vacuum created in their absence. Even the false god emperor, in the end, was shown to be nothing more than a zionist puppet... My gods and my tribe and my land are intertwined. There is no conflict between them, there will never be a position that divides them. They are one, and that is something no Christian can ever honestly claim.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

there is fuck-all evidence supporting the bible myth

How did you come to that conclusion?

that is something no Christian can ever honestly claim

When the new heaven and new earth are revealed, in which "my tribe" (Abraham's seed, through faith in Christ Jesus - you'll forgive me if my keyboard doesn't have greek letters) will live forever, we will have something much more real and meaningful than you have.

I'm not forcing anything on you, just telling you that gravity exists and you are in a freefall.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)

[–] • 10 pts

downvoating shouldnt be punished.

link

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I used to think this too, back when I was a gay nigger.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

quite the intellectual argument. clearly youre a White man.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

I was

you were, but you still are, too

parent
link

[–] • 8 pts

Manual transmission is better than automatic transmission.

link

[–] • 2 pts

Until you're stuck in a traffic jam, inching forward for hours

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

I dunno. keeps it interesting.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Nope DCT is the new way sorry brother, I guess thats a belief that probably less than 1/2 of 1% here believe. Though most would lump a DCT into the auto trans camp... You driven a DCT yet? Thoughts?

parent
link

[–] • 7 pts

I like Brussels sprouts.

link

[–] • 4 pts

Damn you to hell.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

It's alright, I'll eat the portion I grew just for you.

parent
link

[–] • 7 pts

Leasing a car is a bad idea.

link

[–] • 4 pts

Not if you're leasing it through your LLC and writing it off as a business expense.

(I don't do this, I've only heard that it's a possibility. I have a step sister who leases on her own dime like a good goy)

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

You'd have to justify to the IRS that the vehicle was necessary for your business and that you only used it for business.

This is difficult to do unless you have a real business that is generating income and that you use your vehicle for.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Fuck the IRS.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)

[–] • 1 pt

This makes sense if your net worth exceeds what it would have been had those payments gone toward equity.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

Lmao car "equity"

parent
link

Load more (2 replies)

[–] • 1 pt

If you don't drive that much, it may actually be the preferable option.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Unless you don't need to go any where or do anything but want a nice car every 2 to 3 years.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

That's a degenerate lifestyle.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Depends on the circumstances. There's a narrow set of circumstances where it works out well. You have to understand the resale value, the total cost of ownership, your total annual mileage, and current interest rates if financing. If you're getting a car with shit resale value (like a Nissan), and you drive 12,000 miles a year or less, a lease can be a good thing.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Leasing makes sense in some situations. At the end of the lease, you have options to buy or options to sell the right to buy (or something like that), and can absolutely come out ahead. I know somebody that leased, exercised the option to buy, then turned around the same day and sold it to caravan for a profit.

Work the system we have.

parent
link

[–] • 7 pts

Jews are evil as fuck, but are still just a symptom of the current human condition. Getting rid of them would be great, but that's only where the work would start.

link

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts

Jews are evil as fuck, but are still just a symptom of the current human condition. Getting rid of them would be great, but that's only where the work would start.

You misunderstood the question asked.

parent
link

[–] • 6 pts

I've caught plenty of flak on poal for not believing that the problems of this world start and stop with Jews. I thought I was answering in accordance to your question

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

All it does is shines a light on your ignorance. For any serious world problem/conflict can be traced back to Jewish influence.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

Killing people is bad.

link

[–] • 6 pts

with the caveat that communists and low iq are not people.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

See what I mean?

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

For the most part i agree with you, but there needs to be a line somewhere. If you know someone is going to kill other (innocent) people is it okay to kill them? Like thinking of Cannon Hinnant, would have it been okay to execute his killer first because he was known to kill kids? Now keep going with that, should the judge who let a killer out of jail for political (communist) reasons be held accountable? how accountable? Should people threatening judges into persecuting innocent people be held accountable? how accountable?

I see communists as basically the opposite of Christians, they don't have a value or a moral system, they don't think truth plays a positive role in society, and so they all support the killing of people that aren't like them (for reasons).