Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

859

What does poal think of national socialism? do you actually know what it did and what it's goals were, did you do your research or let someone else do it for you?

do you really believe that they were 'le bad guys'? that the holocaust actually happened? there's only been 16 days of peace since 1945 in this 'progressive democratic world of peace'. evidence for the 6 million is paper thin, and most of it is based on shotty eyewitness testimoney, many of which are proven fraudulent.

a lot of you seem to not trust the establishment, especially q-bois, so why trust them on what they say about the most important war of the last century?

What does poal think of national socialism? do you actually know what it did and what it's goals were, did you do your research or let someone else do it for you? do you really believe that they were 'le bad guys'? that the holocaust actually happened? there's only been 16 days of peace since 1945 in this 'progressive democratic world of peace'. evidence for the 6 million is paper thin, and most of it is based on shotty eyewitness testimoney, many of which are proven fraudulent. a lot of you seem to not trust the establishment, especially q-bois, so why trust them on what they say about the most important war of the last century?

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts

poal doesnt understand that it's 2 words. They like the nationalism part and thinks it requires the socialism part. Socialism only works on the small scale, like the Amish, it can never work as a system for a nation as it ALWAYS leads to apathy, indolence, and lethargy.

[–] • 1 pt

And Communism. It always leads to Communism.

[–] • 0 pt

The Amish own the fruit of their own labor. They will probably help a neighbor out. But if the neighbor is lazy and keeps on fucking up without putting in effort to help their own situation, or never returns favors, that Amish benefactor will stop assisting and tell all of his buddies.

[–] • 2 pts

It seems very little of you understand that the 'socialism' in National Socialism is completely 100% removed from Marxist, Leninist, and even pre-Marxist utopian socialism. Hitler was an autist and stubbornly refused to call the ancient concept (more aptly called 'Volkism') anything else but Socialism, which he saw as it's ancient Germania name. He strived to 'take socialism from the socialists.'

The concept of socialism in the NatSoc sense is racial unity and the formation of cooperative nuclear communities, where parasites and criminals are removed. Private property is still guaranteed to the citizens, the rights; including free speech, freedom of religion, and freedom to bear firearms, were never infringed in Germany as they were seen to be necessary to culture a healthy, happy Aryan nation. The hiveminded collectivism or the 'distribution of wealth' is wholly opposed.

All you saying that somehow the ideology which was created to directly fight the growing menace of Jewish bolshlevism will somehow become 'Communist' are revealing that you are politically and historically retarded. Germany boomed and thrived, even late into it's crippling multi-front total war.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

National Socialism is good. The problem is that Nat-Soc elite were members of the Thule Society, an occult, esoteric cabal controlled by Judeo-Satanists.

[–] • 0 pt

One man's Satan is another man's god.

One man's alien from space in flying saucers is another man's Vril-ya ancient species coming up from a Texas sized cavern under Antarctica.

[–] • 0 pt

>: What does a glownigger have to gain from teaching you about the truth of WW2?

Ouch! Own goal and credibility lost entirely..

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I would get rid of the socialist part because socialism always leads to communism.

[–] • 0 pt

it was the best chance for humanity as a whole to break free of the zionist/bolshevik stranglehold.

they were the good guys, and most of the upright people of the world, were suckered into fighting them. we now suffer.

reincarnation is real, and there is still a score to settle.

[–] • 0 pt

Very based. Godspeed friend.

[–] • 0 pt

There is only one type of government: tyranny. You can call it anything you like. Basically, you have anointed bureaucrats telling deplorables what to do. In every case, anarchy would be a better choice then comprised politicians forcing denizens to behave the way they prefer.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Holocaust had to have been fake. There is no way they could have killed all those people the way its claimed they did and there are no bodies or ash piles or burnt bones.

Not sure I'd call nazis good guys. They didn't have to attack Czech or Poland and they certainly seemed like a bunch of tyrants. I'm not really against the occult per say(I like learning about the old gods and religions) but the ppl here who like it today sure seem to be Satanists, and they suck. I wasn't there tho, maybe nazis were just gray like us. Can't say we were the bad guys either. Never met a ww2 vet that thought we'd become Weimar. I'd say the avg nazi was just trying to survive, and that's what life is a struggle to survive.

[–] • 0 pt

Ooh! A cat fight!

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Socialism is commie-lite.

Even Marx explained that the goal of socialism is communism. He wanted to name his "Communist Manefesto", "Socialist Manefesto" but was urged out of it.

The less power and control a government has, the better. Politicians will always use gibs to get elected, and more gibs to stay elected. Eventually, they run out of our money and demand we pay more to keep them gibbing.

What Hitler, and his political party, suggested was National Socialism isn't relevant. It would have ended up like any other Socialist government. The people pay more, get less, and the politicians stay in power by gibbing to lazy assed niggers looking for a hand out.

Load more (1 reply)