Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

172
Seeing people praise the Ukrainian civilians for fighting. I don't see that. I see an EXTREMELY cynical move by the President to put untrained normal people up against one of the best armies in the world which everyone knows would be slaughter. Putin is correct to call this out as "human shield". ZOG continue to be evil.

Seeing people praise the Ukrainian civilians for fighting. I don't see that. I see an EXTREMELY cynical move by the President to put untrained normal people up against one of the best armies in the world which everyone knows would be slaughter. Putin is correct to call this out as "human shield". ZOG continue to be evil.

This poll is now closed.

They are heroically defending their homeland.
24 % (8 votes)
They are pawns of a corrupt regime.
56 % (19 votes)
"There is no war, Putin is a hologram!" -- @picman
21 % (7 votes)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (21).
[–] • 0 pt

A homeland is much more than a home government. It is your peoples culture, your families, your businesses. Like I said in my post, they may be unintentionally on the side of the bad guy, but they are protecting their homeland and therefore theyre heroic, no matter how you feel about it politically.Look up what the word heroic means

[–] • 0 pt

So, the people who fought for the bolshevichs, who were Russian, were heroic?

The communists that fought for Castro, heroic?

Were Mao's fighters, who were Chinese, heroic?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Sort of. But they are also not fighting for their homeland. They are from a foreign power (Jews/CIA in a lot of cases) fighting for a terrible ideology. And even if it was homegrown, they are not fighting for their homeland, they’re fighting for their ideology.That goes beyond the scope of my post. Though they fought and died for their beliefs. They did not cower away when the bullets were flying. They marched in on the front lines and died for their cause. That is somewhat heroic, as in brave/ courageous. It is not necessarily well-intentioned or righteous. It is not heroic in the sense that they are fighting for a noble cause. But once again, my post referred to fighting for your homeland, not against it.

[–] • 0 pt

So, Castro and Mao were "fighting for their homeland" like commies claim to do, and it's likely that the Russians that fought for the bolshevicks thought they were "fighting for their homeland" as well.

Similarly, the Ukrainians fighting for their government, right now, are doing nothing more than geneciding their own people for Jewish interests, but think they are "fighting for their homeland". While Russian sympathizers who are fighting for Russian interests probably think they are "fighting for their homeland" which they believe is Russia. And those with the Azov forces believe they are "fighting for their homeland", too.

All of these people are heroic?

I think not. It's not about n WHAT you're fighting for, or WHY you're fighting. Especially, if the "what" or "why" is some abstract nonsensical slogan like "fighting for our homeland", but rather what you're doing when you're fighting. Are you killing innocent people? Women? Children? Are you committing war crimes? Are you attacking? Or defending? And if your defending, is that defense the result of prior attacks?